>Hi Dan, > >A question on gas exchange. How does VO2 max figure into this discussion? Is >not VO2 max calculated at the extreme high end of exertion? Actually, it gets calibrated using progressive resistance and exertion, and requires the low exertion baseline in the first part of its measurement. Yes, at the extreme limit of work output, you find your VO2 max, but the larger gas exchange components of VO2 max, will be apparent in exchange occurring at 80 % of max HR, at 70 % of max, and at 55% of max. As it falls below this, exertion is so low that exchange can be limited by further slowing of the heart rate ( which controls the amount of blood exposed to the inert gas gradient in the alveoli). How does gas >exchange vary in people with different levels of conditioning while at rest? You could find a point where exchange would be similar, but it would require the very fat person to run a very heigh exertion rate, while the elite athlete was quite relaxed. Since perfusion will suffer durring major 80 to 90% of max HR exertions, this will complicate the offgassing for the very fat, who have poor perfusion any way. >Are not the dives you describe performed by George, performed in a state of >suspended animation ( referring to your comments on his physiological control >through Yoga techniques) deep penetration scooter dives, drift dives? Where is >the effort, and high end exertion that would bring VO2 max into play? On deco, George will begin mild exertion, and will drastically increase his bloodflow by elevating his heart rate. He has no need to hit "high" heart rates, for him to reach even 125 or 130, given a max for him of around 195 HR, this would be easy, comfortable exertion, but with an exponential increase in the volume of blood being exposed to gradient. If gas >exchange is not substantially different at rest at sea level, between the >various stages of conditioning in the control group, would it not be >proportionally the same at rest at 8?9?10? atmospheres?. Much better question! The 2 issues are CO2 processing and Helium/nitrogen offgassing. First, the CO2 issue: If they remain at rest, and no exertion or fear/excitement reactions occur, then there will be NO CO2 issue for these two extremes....On the flip side,.... At 10 atmospheres, a fit diver and very unfit diver, hover over a deep wreck. Both are fine, both are maintaining low HR's, though low for the unfit dive will not be below 80, and low for the fit diver will be 45 bpm. Suddenly, a 25 foot GW Shark swims toward them. The fit diver experieinces a heart rate spike to 170 bpm, while the unfit diver hits about the same. One of them shits his pants---we won't say which this was. After the GW circles for 20 seconds, the high CO2 levels the high respiration rate each stationary diver ( each is hiding behind a bulkhead ) is experiencing, is overloading the unfit diver, who begins to pass out. Luckily, the GW leaves, and the fit diver then has to worry about how to revive the unfit diver. The GW example perhaps is extreme, so if you prefer, replace this with a 12 foot bull shark, circling for several minutes--and this DOES happen on out deep North Palm reefs and wrecks. As to helium/nitrogen offgassing, the exchange rates have huge gradients at 10 atmospheres, and no appreciable gradients at sea level ( assuming no dives in the last 24-48 hours. Having 4 times the blood exposed to gradient on offgassing, the very fit diver will lose helium and nitrogen much faster than the unfit. At sea level, with no gradient, there would be no offgassing for either. Who dives to 250" and >rides a bike? Me. > Swims laps? George ...All the WKPP divers engage in elite level cardiovasular sports or training. Regards, Dan -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]