Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: Todd Leonard <toddl@in*.co*>
Subject: Re: Divers Supply, IANTD, Tom Mount and tragic technicaldiving -Reply
To: Guy.Wittig@Au*.Su*.CO* (Guy Wittig)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:02:12 -0500 (EST)
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
> The whole premise of ideas like the Hog. Rig (and several other major 
> religions) is that someone has had the good ideas already and now we can 
> adopt it ourselves with full faith that it has been thought through by 
> greater minds than ours so we don't have to worry about it. Hey, if we get 
> into trouble we pull out our long hose and say several hail Georges and it 
> will be ok.
> 
> Guy

Guy, I don't know where on earth you got this idea... you couldn't 
possibly be farther from the truth.  To a man, each Hogarthian diver
I've met is able to explain in great detail exactly why they configure 
their gear as they do.  This analysis is an absolutely critical part 
of the picture, and for you to suggest otherwise is a clear indication 
that you simply do not understand what "Hogarthian" is.

Time and again Hogarthian divers have requested that proponents of 
other gear configurations explain their rationale, and the silence 
is deafening.  Nevertheless, once again for the record, if you've 
got a better approach let's hear about it!

In the absense of superior ideas, it's not unusual for divers to
emotionally defend their "right" to configure their gear as they
wish.  This is a smokescreen -- one thing has nothing to do with 
the other.  I can't and won't force you to stop acting like a moron. 
However, I can point out that you are acting like a moron, suggest 
you stop, refuse to dive with you until you stop, and discourage 
others from following your example.  That's all that's going on.

I agree with most of what Mike Zimmerman has said in this thread.
To elaborate, I am absolutely opposed to some government agency
telling me how to configure my gear, but I see no problem with a
private agency saying "this is the way we teach our students how
to configure gear, these are the reasons we do so, and if you
don't agree then we're not the right training agency for you".  
If I don't agree, I'll go to another agency or to none at all.  
I *want* my training agencies to take a stand.  I want them to 
feel free to say that there are some extraordinarily stupid gear 
configurations in use, that people are dying for no damn reason, 
that it doesn't have to be that way, and that they are willing 
to step up to the plate and teach the right way.  A training 
agency's refusal to participate in this carnage would not hinder 
anyone's "rights" whatsoever, it would simply improve the quality 
of that agency's training.  (BTW, substitute fitness requirements 
for gear configuration, and this is all still true.)

- Todd

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]