At 02:36 PM 25/02/1998 -0000, Phil Clarke wrote: >>>>you didnt answer me. >> >>>What was the question? >> >>would you agree "a 32 inch hose is less grief than a 2m one when >>kitting up on RIB's"? No. The longer hose is less grief when kitting up in a RIB: In the first place, if your short hose gets trapped between you and the tank(s) while you are kitting up, you will have a good deal of difficulty reaching round behind you to find it, get hold of it and free it to bring it around to the front, without help. The long hose, on the other hand, is clipped off at the front chest d-ring where it can be located instantly. If it is not clipped off, the extra length makes it easier to locate, take hold of and extricate. Secondly, the problem with the shorter hose is that it is just the right length to place your second stage under your tanks when you are lifting and putting down scuba gear in a RIB (and, incidentally, on a hardboat). With the long hose, however, your second stage is clipped up safely out of harm's way on the chest d-ring. If it is not clipped off, the longer hose means it is less likely to hang directly beneath your cylinders when you are lifting and placing your rig down. One further point. You would be Fence-Post Stupid to compromise your and your fellow-divers' in-water safety to gain the doubtful in-boat convenience of the short hose. Phil, it isn't just me. Many people have now posted to point out that you are wrong, that your arguuments against Hogarthian are flawed, and that your conditions aren't so extreme or different as to somehow exempt you from enjoying the benefits and the relative safety of Hogarthian diving. Try it. rgrds billyw -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]