Is PADI now offering trimix? This doesn't sound like PADI. ---------- > From: Bill Mee <wwm@sa*.ne*> > To: techdiver@aquanaut.com > Cc: cavers@ww*.ge*.co*; gmirvine@sa*.ne* > Subject: BAD NEWS: Fallout from the WPB tragedy > Date: Thursday, January 22, 1998 3:05 PM > > Predictably, we are now beginning to observe the inevitable fallout from > the single worst technical diving accident, ever. Independently, one of > the largest gas suppliers in the Southeast, Tri-Gas, has reported that > they are considering a total ban on the sale of Helium and other gases > for the purpose of diving. This, they say, is a direct result of > liability issues raised following the well publicized WPB tragedy. > > I hope that the consequences of this policy are not lost on our friends > in the technical diving instructional community. While Divers Supply > has probably lost there taste for deep offshore instruction in tri-mix > diving, I am sure that there are many others around the country who > still plan to make a go of this. I would think that IANTD, TDI, ANDI, > NAUI and PADI, to name just a few, have no active plans afoot to remove > tri-mix from their present or future curricula. > > It would be unfair to place all of the blame on the folks at Divers > Supply for this unhappy turn of events in that the sort of "former" > behaviors tolerated at their operation are pandemic throughout technical > diving. It was just a matter of time before a similar event transpired > somewhere else. > > Still, I can only speculate that if Divers Supply had not become > involved with preventing the WKPP from recovering material associated > with the WPB tragedy in a timely fashion, we might have quickly absolved > the role of breathing gases as contributory to the fatalities. > Instead, these people continue to complain about "malicious attacks" by > a few on the Internet (sound familiar?) as well as the "slanderous and > malice(sic) behavior that's been demonstrated on the internet". In > other words it's our fault that these three people are dead and that we > have no right to discuss the context of this tragedy as it relates to > diving, especially in light of the fact that the primary focus of this > discussion list is technical diving. Perish the thought that freedom of > speech and opinion be exercised unconstrained. > > PLEASE read Dan Volker's articulate and thoughtful recent piece on > this matter. Dan discusses the problems and known specifics of the > accident, what measures should be taken to prevent reoccurrence and the > role of Divers Supply in actively interfering with the recovery efforts > of the WKPP. > > Australia openly outlaws some forms of technical diving. Now "technical > diving" will be de facto outlawed here by the unavailability of > breathing gas. The WKPP will still be able to obtain gas and dive it's > permitted sites, but what about you? > > There are plenty of people out there who passionately hate George Irvine > for his self appointed role as dive industry pundit and harbinger of > doom, if equipment, training practices and procedures are not cleaned > up. Well, for all of those personal preference, thin skinned types out > there, your boys have really hit it out of the ball park now. In fact > now may be a good time to sell your "techno" dive gear and sign up for > golf lessons instead of advanced trimix. > > Sorry folks, > > Bill Mee -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]