Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Greg Zambeck" <gzambeck@us*.ne*>
To: <wwm@sa*.ne*>, "Diver69500" <Diver69500@ao*.co*>
Cc: <gmirvine@sa*.ne*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>, <cavers@ww*.ge*.co*>
Subject: Re: Georges comments on myself trying to sell a scooter
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 08:32:33 -0500
Why should a diver spend that much money for a product that has to be
reparied as soon as you by it?

----------
> From: Bill Mee <wwm@sa*.ne*>
> To: Diver69500 <Diver69500@ao*.co*>
> Cc: gmirvine@sa*.ne*; techdiver@aquanaut.com; cavers@ww*.ge*.co*
> Subject: Re: Georges comments on myself trying to sell a scooter
> Date: Monday, January 05, 1998 7:52 PM
> 
> Charles,
> 
> Goerge is completely correct. Farallons are marginally reliable and
> impractical for any serious socalled "technical" diving. You have
> obviously concluded this yourself and this is why you are selling the
> damn thing.  BTW, since when is Peter Vicker's a "legitimate" company?  
> 
> Your childish comments about Jason and Tom's scooters constructed by us
> are uninformed rubbish. Your socalled "technical" diving buddies
> couldn't even repair a "complex device" like a  reed switch and returned
> the entire scooter which George immediately repaired and returned to
> them.  As for the length of the scooters being different this is utter
> nonsense. The bodies are precisely cut and turned on a CNC lathe and are
> very accurate.  You are mistakenly referring to the internal bulkhead
> spacing on the batteries which only serves to prove that you have no
> idea of what you are talking about and is yet another reason why you
> should call the make a wish foundation to remove your Farallon
> immediately.
> 
> The original motor is manufactured by Oceanic (Mako) and they do not
> warrant this motor; however George does accept full responsiblity for
> the motor and replaces or repairs, at his often considerable expense any
> problem motors. George personally dismantles, tests and reassembles the
> Mako motors upon receiving them from the factory.  These shunt wound
> fractional horsepower DC electric motors are not high technology devices
> and like anything else are subject to failure.  George personally
> warrants these devices despite the fact that the manufacturer accepts no
> responsibility. Any WKPP scooter which experiences a problem or has been
> damaged in such cataclysmic events as a car accident have been repaired
> by George at no charge.  I can assure you that the failure modes on a
> WKPP scooter are significantly less than anything else out there.  
> 
> As for the buoyancy, Jason and Tom were informed that the ballasting of
> the scooters must be changed for usage in salt water. An addtional 2 lbs
> of weight must be added to the unit to neutralize it for usage in
> seawater, although a highly technical concept such as water density
> might elude certain individuals. With respect to the speed these systems
> are not designed to be extremely fast (150 - 200 fpm), but rather very
> reliable. All of the WKPPs extreme exposure long range cave dives have
> been accomplished with these scooters and nobody is still in the cave.
> 
> You comments are incoherent, ill advised and only demonstrate why you
> should probably sell all of your dive gear and take up golf.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bill Mee
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]