Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_883026993_boundary Content-ID: <0_883026993@in*.ma*.ao*.co*.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII george, he is right! he is "not interested in ignoring history " he is interested in creating it. look at his inflamitory remarks about the "history" that he quotes. based on innunedos & fabrications. this is deffinitly the mark of a true "historian". george please don't get between him & his facts. hey sharkey - how many research divers were diving on scuba (deeper than 130 fsw) in the 50's-60's-70's or 80's. & i am not refering to commercial divers. just those research divers you have soooo much information & statistics on????? hank In a message dated 97-12-23 12:29:41 EST, Wahoo2001 writes: In a message dated 97-12-22 20:13:24 EST, gmirvine@sa*.ne* writes: << Steve, this guy Sharkey is still trying to tell everyone that deep air diving is ok. He claims all kinds of "reaserch diving" is done on air. He is FOS - ignore him >> Gee George, how kind of you to remember me, but, as you are so find of saying, get it right. In point of fact all I did was point out to George that since 1952, when record keeping began, there has not been a single research diving fatality in the research diving community in the depth range of concern to deep air diving. If that is full of shit, so be it. Those are the facts. I am not an advocate of Deep Air, I believe in using the best practical technology for solving any problem that comes along, but I do not believe in ignoring history, I look to see what can be learned from it. It appears that George would rather pretend that it did not happen. Phil --part0_883026993_boundary Content-ID: <0_883026993@in*.ma*.ao*.co*.2> Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline From: Wahoo2001 <Wahoo2001@ao*.co*> Return-path: <Wahoo2001@ao*.co*> To: Wahoojan@ao*.co*, GarlooEnt@ao*.co*, JS1SUBAQUA@ao*.co*, WreckValle@ao*.co* Subject: Fwd: Wahoo Safety Record Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 12:29:41 EST Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="part1_883026993_boundary" --part1_883026993_boundary Content-ID: <0_883026993@in*.ma*.ao*.co*.3> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII --part1_883026993_boundary Content-ID: <0_883026993@in*.ma*.ao*.co*.4> Content-type: message/rfc822 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline From: PHSHARKEY <PHSHARKEY@ao*.co*> Return-path: <PHSHARKEY@ao*.co*> To: gmirvine@sa*.ne*, Wahoo2001@ao*.co* Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com, wreckdiver@wr*.co*, Wahoojan@ao*.co*, wahoo@wa*.co*, GLICKLE@ma*.no*.co*, LIMudfish@ao*.co*, NEDJPUB@ao*.co*, MDV3000@ao*.co*, hnuutinen@co*.co*, randi_eisen@ne*.hs*.ed*, YMCACSJ@ao*.co*, underwaterapplications@co*.co*, Va62@di*.pi*.co*, chairman@bs*.co*, SLJ1655@ao*.co*, Sealass@ao*.co*, stetter@bs*.at*.co*, Captdeep6@ao*.co*, VINCEHEELY@ao*.co*, Rls3dive@ao*.co*, Raimo4252@ao*.co*, PGRN98@ao*.co*, conradetss@ms*.co*, jefferytmiller@ju*.co*, Foxride3@ao*.co*, GMiiii@in*.co*, PaulGacek@ao*.co*, 76265.65@co*.co*, billyd@kw*.co*, KathyNAUI@ao*.co*, stushd@pa*.co*, 103502.3477@co*.co*, Ussfriel@ao*.co*, JS1SUBAQUA@ao*.co*, WreckValle@ao*.co*, NICKSKYDIV@ao*.co*, CAPTZEROOO@ao*.co* Subject: Re: Wahoo Safety Record Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 02:03:00 EST Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit In a message dated 97-12-22 20:13:24 EST, gmirvine@sa*.ne* writes: << Steve, this guy Sharkey is still trying to tell everyone that deep air diving is ok. He claims all kinds of "reaserch diving" is done on air. He is FOS - ignore him >> Gee George, how kind of you to remember me, but, as you are so find of saying, get it right. In point of fact all I did was point out to George that since 1952, when record keeping began, there has not been a single research diving fatality in the research diving community in the depth range of concern to deep air diving. If that is full of shit, so be it. Those are the facts. I am not an advocate of Deep Air, I believe in using the best practical technology for solving any problem that comes along, but I do not believe in ignoring history, I look to see what can be learned from it. It appears that George would rather pretend that it did not happen. Phil --part1_883026993_boundary-- --part0_883026993_boundary-- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]