Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 22:57:01 -0500
From: "Thomas A. Easop" <tae@pe*.ne*>
Organization: EPI
To: John Dunk <screwloose@el*.co*>
CC: donn@le*.ne*.au*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Accelerated O2 ( Was Why we do not use 80/20
John Dunk wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 23 Nov 1997 16:50:04 +1000, you wrote:
> 
> > 4) In this same interest you will find that when you graduate to real
> >diving, as in caves,  you will not want to accellerate your ppo2 at
> >lower depths while still being faced with a long decompression at
> >shallower depths, and making bizarre mixes  to do this is a dangerous
> >mistake (just like the fantasy of holding an accellerated ppo2 on a
> >rebreather throughout a deco). I am anticipating the thinking that the
> >80/20  crowd would then go to an additional oxygen in cave without
> >accounting for total exposure, and subject themselves to the risk of tox
> >in the final deco steps. Tox you do not get out of - bends you do.
> 
> Would someone explain' the "fantasy" of holding an accelerated ppo2
> on a rebreather  throughout a deco ' and why it's a fantasy?Are we
> talking tox here or what?And how does  80/20 supposedly help divers
> with poor buoyancy control? Hope I didn't come inb too late on this
> one.  Also, someone mind listing the claimed benefits of 80/2?.
> Thanks
> 
>    John Dunk                                        o
>    Tallahassee,Fl                                    o
>    screwloose@el*.co*                      ____o_____
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

To address the bouyancy issue soley, the gas choice does not affect bouyancy.
The diver's lack of bouyancy 
skills forces them to use 80/20.

A diver who has poor bouyancy control would find it easiest to do a O2 deco
stop at 20 feet/6 meters rather 
than at 10 feet/3 meters. This diver will then want to use 80/20. This is a
wrong reason to be using 80/20. 
The correct thing to do is learn and practice correct bouyancy control.

The reason it is easier to do an 02 stop at 20ft is that there is less of a
preasure differencial there than 
at 10ft. At 10ft if you inadvertantly move up a foot to 9ft you will be more
positively bouyant (from the 
resulting expansion of your dry suit or BC) than if you moved up one foot from
20ft. to 19ft. This diver with 
poor control could find himself very quickly at 8ft. and unable to recover,
ending up at the surface with 
omitted deco. The greater differential at 10ft. also means that changes in body
orientation and attitude 
(prone to kneeling) will cause bouyancy changes, which may not manifest at 20ft.

Thus, if the diver is at 20ft becuase they are not confident about their
bouyancy control, they would not 
choose pure 02. 80/20 has a p02 of 1.28 at 20ft., giving the diver the margin
of error needed to stay within 
limits. Divers doing deco at 10ft on pure 02 have 20ft margin of error, they
can inadvertantly drift 20ft 
deeper before the p02 approaches anything worrisome. The diver doing deco at 20
wants the same margin of 
error. It neccesatates mixing to 80/20.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]