Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <CHKBOONE@ao*.co*>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 12:12:02 -0500 (EST)
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: nuclear wave function quantum stuff

Devin,

In a message dated 97-11-17 10:34:08 EST, you write:

<< Actually....
  
 electromagnetic radiation is a particle..... and a wave.....
   
 -D
 
 really, sort of... >>

----------------------------------------------
Technically you're right.   But then, actually, we're all wrong.   (again;
really, sort of)

You have just entered the realm where men have to write entire books just to
define one term, get a seemingly simple point across, or say what they mean
without being misunderstood.

Elemental matter and energy exhibit properties of both waves and particles.

Actually, we have no earthly idea what anything really "is" - no knowledge of
the deep realities of the universe.   So, all we can ultimately say about
these entities is that they exhibit properties of this or that and we can
only describe them (and most other phenomena) by describing how they react
under the influence of other phenomena, which we also have no real
understanding of.   

Since we don't know what an electron actually "IS", and never can, we are
stuck having to define it by what it appears to "do".   Quantum theory is an
attempt on the part of physicists to deal with this dilemma and still be able
to work with matter and energy in some seemingly meaningful way in spite of
the fact that it defies intuition.   Just like Newton's set of laws these too
will be found wanting some day and modified accordingly.  

Matter and energy are mathematically expressible in the same terms and by the
same formulas at this level and the quantum concept of a wave takes a book to
describe (and turns out not to be exactly what we normally think of as
waves).   
There is no quantum concept of a particle that satisfactorily cross
references to our intuitive ideas.

I "think" one of the things we can say about electrons and protons that we
can not say about gamma rays (in spite of the fact that they all exhibit
properties of both waves and particles) is that they are easily stopped by
other matter and seem to remain intact as when they pile up on a surface
creating a charge or strike this screen I am looking at and bleed off, still
actually in the circuit.   Gamma rays, however, are not so much stopped by
matter as absorbed, whereupon they become non existent as separate
independent entities.  (please don't go into wave functions and probable
position / velocity / direction ).

It's rough having only 5 pitiful short range senses and an inquiring mind
that you can't always trust.   Nature is cruel !   Then again, maybe it is
very kind to allow us our delusions ?

All very stimulating stuff, but you realize, of course, that if we go much
further with this heavy theory stuff were going to be drummed off the list.
  At the speeds we're dealing with we better stick with Newton's summation of
the situation.

Good response, but I don't have time to bite right now.   This is just a
nibble on the line.   Maybe we can get Esat going ?

Chuck

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]