Hey, Tom- Were you at 300' when you did the #5 calculation on page 296 of Mixed Gas Diving? I get 137.62, not 144. Jim On 11/4/97 4:02 PM Tom Mount wrote: >Jack and Jon > >I have reasonable math skills, Dick Williams MD also does and we did the >test 3 times. The point is with a focussed mind you can do single points >of concentration and work, What the test proved to me was the real >danger of narcosis in that when given multiple factors you lose >everything and yopu lose it quickly. It means one may go from a point of >feeling quite in control to totally losing it when more than one >focussed event has to be accomplished. That was the point I thought I >made in the post. > > >Tom > Kreska wrote: >> >> Maybe he has NO math skills at any atmosphere, huh? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: John R. Rose [SMTP:rose@CS*.Sc*.ED*] >> Sent: Monday, November 03, 1997 7:51 PM >> To: TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne* >> Cc: jeg154@ps*.ed*; gmirvine@sa*.ne*; techdiver@aquanaut.com; >cavers@ge*.co* >> Subject: Re: Math Under Pressure >> >> > >> > Jon >> > >> > I have completed math test during actual research both in chamber and in >> > the water. In the book mixed gas diving the results are discussed. >> > >> > In my experiences our personal abilities to do the math alone, as well >> > as purdue pegboard test and a variety of other test was not imparied >> > significantly. Much less than we expected and we did these test at a >> > variety of depths up to 300 feet/91 meters. >> >> Tom, >> >> Let me see if I understand you correctly. Are you saying that your >> math skills at 300 feet do not differ significantly from your math >> skills at 1 ATA? >> >> -John > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]