Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 17 Oct 1997 00:38:51 -0400
To: Jason Reese <jreese@en*.dt*.ha*.co*>
From: Bill Bott <aquadart@ix*.ne*.co*>
Subject: Re: IANTD & trimix
Cc: tech Divers List <Techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Jason,
 It is clear that if you are tri-mix certified your instructor was a dope
or you slept through at least part of the class.  There is nothing that
says the mixed gas should be hypoxic.  For that matter it could well be
hyperoxic.  I have done a few "tri-mix" dives this summer in the 150'-170'
range using a normoxic tri-mix with 25% He (see archives on marking tanks).
 It makes for a low END and keeps the PpO2 below 1.4ATA.  I know of an
Instructor who uses a 34% O2 15-20% He on some dives in the 100' range.  No
risk of anoxia with that gas don't you think?


At 09:28 AM 10/16/97 -0700, you wrote:
>Are you getting trimix and nitrox mixed up?  130 feet would be pushing it
>for something like EAN32 (1.6 pp at 130).  However, narcosis wouldn't be
>that much of a problem due to the lowered nitrogen content.  The lowered pp
>of nitrogen would make the dive equivalent to ~110fsw (as far as narcosis is
>concerned).
>
>Trimix is generally never used shallower than 100-120 ft.  Depending on the
>mix you could die of asphyxia at shallow depths with trimix due to the
>reduced oxygen.
>
>                                -- Jason
>
>
>At 09:20 PM 10/15/97 EDT, Hans Petter Roverud wrote:
>>Somebody stated: Technical trimix is a deep air
>>course. I believe he's right -- this course is 
>>definitely bordering on the "deep air" that most
>>most of us agree to avoid.
>>
>>My deepest "technical nitrox" dive was a nitrox
>>23 dive to 160'. Of course, 23% oxygen is 
>>a ridiculous mix since it's not worth the effort,
>>but the point was to practice making EAD calculations. The
>>purposes of "technical nitrox" are to learn gas
>>management, practice swimming with a heavy rig 
>>and practice gas switches. 
>>
>>My question to the board is, what do you think
>>would be the preferred depth limit? We definitely
>>do not need "level stoned" yet we do want a
>>realistic task loading, deco obligation included.
>>I would suggest 130' as a good target depth for
>>"technical nitrox" -- it's enough to provide a
>>realistic training scenario for future trimix divers, yet
>>narcosis is not a problem.
>>
>>However, as a physiologist I know that narcosis
>>can be measured at depths shallower than 100'. If
>>we demand no narcosis whatsoever, we really have
>>to pull back. What is a reasonable EAD for a
>>trimix dive? Ask some and the answer is 200' -- 
>>ask others and they go 100'. Ask me and you get
>>100' - 130'. I believe the "technical nitrox", 
>>"extended range air" or whatever you call it 
>>should have a target depth matching the EAD you
>>will prefer as a trimix diver. Learning the 
>>toting, configuring, switching and balancing 
>>the rig does not depend on going deep. Actually,
>>some of the best training may be to swim 
>>sidemounts for an hour at 20'. 
>>
>>I think most of the current philosophies are 
>>based on giving students a taste of narcosis
>>and prove the need for trimix. I believe most
>>of today's trimix divers have thorough 
>>knowledge of nitrogen narcosis from past 
>>experience. 
>>
>>Discussing this with some friends,
>>the opinion was voiced that past deep air experience 
>>might be an advantage. I half-heartedly
>>disagree. Sure, it may be sort of an advantage 
>>to have been there and know what to avoid, but I 
>>don't think new trimix divers need to go 
>>through the same phase of trial and error. In
>>retrospect, an advantage but no prerequisite, and
>>definitely not the direct way to learn trimix.
>>We need to build a record and gain experience
>>underwater doing what we're supposed to do. If 
>>trimix is the tool of the trade, it makes a lot
>>more sense to log more trimix dives than it 
>>does to practice deep (or even deepish) air
>>dives. 
>>
>>My conclusion: 130' is a good target depth for
>>practicing and preparing for trimix. What do 
>>you say? 
>>  
>>   
>> 
>>
>>  
>>--
>>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>>
>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>
>

Bill (aquadart) Bott
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]