Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 10:49:56 -0400
From: "william" <william@ca*.co*>
To: Karen Flynn <kflynn1@er*.co*>
CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Tech Diver or Tech Keyboard Operator
Karen Flynn wrote:
> 
> I have to admit that I've been watching the "Cobber's trimix" thread for the
past couple
> of days before posting.  It just got the better of me tonight and I had to say
> something.
> 
> First, Cobb admits to diving the "Eureka" off the NC/VA state border with
**mix** to
> determine the difference between a "deep air" buzz and trimix.  Swears he saw
some
> difference.  Come on now JIM...the Eureka's 116 fsw (35m) deep with an
occasional wash
> out to a max 118 fsw (35.9m).  NOBODY'S definition of deep air, or **deep
anything** is
> in that range.  Using Tx on a 116 fsw (35m) dive with a low **home brewed**
FN2 put you
> at an EAD of what....35 fsw (10.6m)???  How many of us out there notice the
"buzz"
> difference between 35 fsw and 116 fsw??  Really now!!
> 
> The average REAL mid-Atlantic Tx wreck dives (Monitor, E.M. Clark, St.
Augustine,etc)
> are lying in the 240 to 260 fsw (+/-75m) range and you should be on your 6th+
**deco
> stop** before you hit 35 fsw.  Matter of fact, you're first deco stop on
those dives
> would be below your max depth on the "Eureka".  So maybe you got the
"pre-requisite"
> number of gas switches in to make it a technical dive - but on the
Eureka...who's
> fooling who??  Who cares??
> 
> I guess I'm an idealistic gal and believe it takes more than equipment buying
savvy, an
> understanding of tech diving lingo, and a keyboard to make you a techncal
diver.  Seems
> to me you should be doing the dives.  Experience does matter.
> 
> Karen Flynn
> 
> PS: IANTD TX certified #560 ('95) and "grandfathered" out of the deep air
pre-requisite
> by Billy Deans due to level of ACTUAL Tx experience prior to the IANTD
course.  Now go
> ahead - flame away...
> 
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
I think what Jim was saying was not just how hard a dive he made nor how
technical. Just how he had tried it and how he felt about the dive. I
really don't think he was trying to tell anyone anymore than that. I
think that there has been times when i have felt the effects of N2 at
relatively shallow depths. I keep thinking back to Georges statement of
helium is your friend. If there is relavance to using Helium at shallow
depths why not? I think that there are other things to consider than
just getting  narced. I won't bore anyone with my attempt at describing
these but they are in the archives.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]