Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
EJ, You are correct and I don't think any of the deco programs factor in the function thereby fooling us into thinking that 100% is better than 80% - FOR DECO ! Leon >Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 02:42:55 -0500 >To: gmirvine@sa*.ne*, techdiver@aquanaut.com >From: "E.J. Sadler" <ejsadler@Pa*.ne*> >Subject: Re: WHY WE DO NOT USE 80/20 >Although I can't remeber where I read it, and I am trying to locate it, I thought that there was some newer research indicating that deco mixes in the 85 - 95 percent ranges were actually more efficient in the off gassing of inert gasses due to the vasoconstrictive nature of pure O2. Does anybody recall hearing about this? Or was I just in another nitrogen induced day dream? E.J. ______________________________ E.J. Sadler / Particle Studios ejsadler@pa*.ne* 800.704.3900 http://particles.net ______________________________ -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. _____________________________________________________________________ Sent by RocketMail. Get your free e-mail at http://www.rocketmail.com -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]