Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Wilson Angerson" <gqva06@ud*.gl*.ac*.uk*>
Organization: Glasgow University
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 14:29:05 GMT
Subject: Re: Narcosis (cont.)
Robert Wolov wrote:

> At 09:10 AM +0100 8/22/97, John Brett wrote:
> >I've been told by several people now that making a rapid descent
> >massively increases the effects of narcosis. Does anyone here
> >have a definitive answer as to why?
> >
> >Best guess:
> >If one is finning like &^"stlg$ to get down, the exertion increases C02
> >retention, and I can see that having an effect. Is this the case, and
> >is this the only contributing factor?
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> I don't know about "massively" since narcosis onset and sensitivity to same
> seems to have so many individual variants, but I too have read that rate of
> decent does indeed effect the likelihood of narcosis onset.
> 
> However, it doesn't seem to be related to CO2 retention.
> 
> Bove & Davis's textbook on diving medicine (latest 3rd edition 1997)
> specifically addresses CO2 retention as *NOT* a factor for narcosis and
> cite a study by Blenkarn that showed no arterial CO2 retention on subjects
> breathing either compressed air or Heliox at 190 or 286 feet. There are
> other studies that also fail to support the CO2 retention theory of
> narcosis, but I won't bore you with the details.
> 
> Don't misunderstand. The effects of CO2 retention are real (and profound)
> but they are ADDITIVE to not causitive of the inert gas narcosis effect (to
> the best of our understanding)

Hi Robb,

I think the effect of rapid descents on inert gas narcosis has been 
confirmed in some chamber studies. Subjects had a poor performance 
score immediately after the initial pressurisation, then it improved 
despite the fact that they were (slowly) being taken deeper, then 
fell off again as they got seriously deep.

As you say, the theory that CO2 is responsible for narcosis is long 
out the window, but I'm still wondering whether CO2 retention might 
be an important potentiating factor in narcosis immediately after 
a rapid descent. If the effects of inert gases and CO2 are additive 
(and more so if they are synergistic), could it explain the 
observations if rapid descents cause temporary CO2 retention? I don't 
know whether this actually happens, but it seems at least 
conceivable. Apart from the effect of exertion mentioned by John 
(which wouldn't apply in the chamber dives), could respiratory 
depression and/or reduced blood CO2 transport due to a suddenly 
increased PaO2, or even increased work of breathing, cause a blip in 
tissue CO2 before there's a respiratory response to blow it off?

Cheers,

Wilson

PS Since writing the above I've had a chance to go home and check out 
Bennett & Elliott 2nd ed. 1975. In Bennett's chapter on inert gas 
narcosis he states that "normally rapid compression potentiates 
compressed air narcosis due to carbon dioxide retention" and cites 
several studies. I haven't seen any of the original papers and don't 
know which of them just address the effect of rapid compression as 
opposed to causal mechanisms. One of them is Bean (1950), which 
reportedly showed an acute rise in alveolar CO2 associated with rapid 
compression of dogs. As I'm sure you'll know, this was one of the 
studies that led to the now discredited theory that CO2 is *solely* 
responsible for narcosis, but it may be that the data are still 
relevant to the question of potentiation of N2 narcosis by CO2 in the 
context of rapid compression. I'll forward all the references if 
you're interested, but maybe there is some more recent work (i.e. 
post 1975) that addresses this?

In your later post you make the point that hypercapnia produces 
different symptoms from inert gas narcosis. But would it be fair to 
say that, as far as some of the performance tests used to study 
narcosis are concerned, narcosis *plus* hypercapnia just looks like 
more severe narcosis?

PPS Got a nice surprise last night - last minute place on a boat for 
the Sound of Mull wrecks tomorrow :-)

Cheers again

Wilson
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]