Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Subject: Re: Oxygen - low blow
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 97 16:40:06 -0400
From: Jim Cobb <cobber@mi*.co*>
To: <CHKBOONE@ao*.co*>, "Tech Diver" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Man, talk about comparing apples to oranges. Besides the fact that O2 is 
is mentioned with this, there is absolutely NO relevance to the topic at 
hand. And, I might point out, if the shipment was 02 cylinders, this 
accident would never have happened. These generators are incendiary 
devices, not compressed gas cylinders.

Cut the bullshit, Chuck. We know where you stand. The next thing you know 
you will be pulling up comparisons to railroad crossing/school bus 
accedents to O2 cleaning, and then saying in a high-pitched sally 
struthers-like voice "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN!".

   Jim

On 8/13/97 10:33 AM CHKBOONE@ao*.co* wrote:

>
>Steve,
>
>How much is Scubapro paying you to help them substantiate the need for
>dedicated nitrox valves and regulators ?
>
>Perhaps the following will cover your request for documentation of the
>problem and the hazard.   There is lots more but this pretty much covers all
>the bases in principle, I think.
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>In a recent article in The Miami Herald, ValuJet states that "no decision or
>action by the airline or its employees can be linked to the accident". 
>
>NTSB documents, which are presented on this web site, prove that this is a
>misrepresentation of fact. On 3/11/96, ValuJet sent an engineering order to
>SabreTech which instructed them to remove the expired oxygen generators from
>aircraft that were being refurbished for ValuJet and, furthermore, that these
>useless oxygen generators were to be "returned to stores". (See The "Return
>to Stores" Engineering Order, Page 3, Item 12.1.3) 
>
>This order was contrary to established procedures which require that expired
>oxygen generators should be properly disposed of as Hazardous Waste in
>compliance with Federal law. 
>
>Additionally, ValuJet failed to order safety caps which were required to
>prevent the oxygen generators from discharging. (See Page 4, Item 13.3) 
>
>This document proves that ValuJet is primarily responsible for causing the
>oxygen generators to be placed aboard Flight 592. If this engineering order
>had instructed SabreTech to dispose of the oxygen generators properly as
>required by law, the 110 passengers and crew of Flight 592 would be alive
>today. Instead, ValuJet ordered the oxygen generators returned to Atlanta. 
>------------------------------------------
>
>   Can you tell me how you are different from these guys at Value Jet who
>also thought the procedures were BS - other than the fact that you are openly
>encouraging others to do the same thing as you ?
>
>Chuck
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]