>>But Jeoff, you haven't said what you have over there, I've highlighted a >>small selection of our wrecks. So go for it. >>Trying to say that Fla. has the diversity and immense number of wrecks >that >>we have over here is pure foolishness, and displays a complete ignorance >of >>our maritime heritage. > >not to get off topic, but is this "maritime heritage" in some way linked to >maritime ability? > >guess my family was pretty lucky to make it out of the harbor 377 years >ago, huh? > >glen Ability? Err, yes, Glen. During the First World War, one of the Royal Navy's criteria for commissioning ships was to out-muscle the next TWO most powerful navy's in the world. But you knew that, didn't you? Obviously things have changed a bit since then, have you looked up "heritage" in the dictionary. After that, borrow an encyclopaedia and look up Henry VIII, then Armada, then chronometer, then Greenwich, then Trafalgar, then steam, then submarine, then German Imperial High Seas Fleet. Then look up Dover Straits. You may find the word's "busiest shipping channel in the world" close by, along with "U-boat". Man, this is like shooting Hogarthian fish in a barrel. Whilst you're all telling me to get my head out of my butt or other other sparkling gems of wit, why don't you get a clue for yourselves. Next, please. Steve -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]