Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Ocean Diving Inc." <divetek@ic*.ne*>
To: "'techdiver@aquanaut.com'" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: Standards, Deep Air, Narcotic Mixes - Three Wedings and a few Funerals
Date: Fri, 30 May 1997 14:36:28 -0400
WHY IT'S CALLED "TECHNICAL DIVING"

Because CNS and OTU tracking,  Calculating RMV, Configuring gear and =
learning the skills needed to dive beyond established  no-decompression =
limits are not taught in a recreational course yet. Sure there are a lot =
of other reasons but  maybe some day you will be able to sign up for a =
PADI Deep Diver Course and get this info. For now you must choose =
whether or not to leave the nest and take on greater risks or to just =
stay put and accept  the minimal risks that present themselves to all =
divers.
"Rules of engagement were made your  protection and the safety of your =
crew."  "I saw the shot, there was no danger, so I took it." "You took =
it and broke a major rule..."  TOPGUN 1984=20
=20
George, Do you get it?  =20
Sempre Deep,
Capt. Jim=20


-----Original Message-----
From:	gmirvine@sa*.ne* [SMTP:gmirvine@sa*.ne*]
Sent:	Wednesday, May 28, 1997 4:01 PM
To:	Tom Mount
Cc:	cavers@ge*.co*; techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject:	Re: Standards, Deep Air, Narcotic Mixes - Three Wedings and a =
few Funerals

Tom, forgetting for a moment the dichotomy of the standards ( 130 for
mix, 180 for eanx), why do I need to come to you to dive deep on air? I
can do that myself.

 Another question - why is this being called "technical diving", and
since when do the students make the standards. Tom, we have some
seriously flawed logic in all of this - you are the boss, you should be
setting the pace.


Tom Mount wrote:
>=20
> gmirvine@sa*.ne* wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > ---Tom Mount <TOM.MOUNT@wo*.at*.ne*> wrote:
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >          If this is so safe, then why are a disproportionate number =
of
> > cave divng accidents amoung trained divers below 130 , and why are a
> > disproportionate number of ocean diving accidents below 130?
>=20
> Most of these are deeper than 180 feet, again see our standards post
> >
> >
> >          The concept that there is such a thing as "ability to =
handle
> > impairment" is fundamentallly flawed. Your "standards" need =

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]