Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sat, 3 May 1997 23:56:12 +0100
To: Steve Millard <ec96@li*.ac*.uk*>
Cc: Techdiver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
From: Chris Hellas <chris@de*.de*.co*.uk*>
Subject: Re: 2nd Report on IANTD-UK Conference 1997
In message <ECS9705021256A@li*.ac*.uk*>, Steve Millard
<ec96@li*.ac*.uk*> writes
>        BILL STONE              CIS-LUNAR MK.5
>
>For his 2nd formal presentation Bill Stone began by announcing WAKULLA 2 - 
Oct. 
>1 1997 to Jan 30 1998.  The U S Deep Cave Team (USDCT) is looking for divers
to 
>assist with this expedition with a range of skill levels, including rebreather 
>diver, support diver, programmers and chamber operators.

Steve
       Thanks for posting the proceedings.

I have a few observations....

1) I am curious as to the request for assistance for such a high level
project. For this kind of 'serious' work I would expect an exclusive
group of finely tuned, very fit and focused indiduals. To throw it open
in this way seems a little desparate.
>
>An overview was first given of the Wakulla Springs cave and the 1987 WAKULLA 1 
>expedition.  The development of a decompression habitat was reviewed which
would 
>enable up to 6 divers to decompress for 10 to 15 hours in warm dry conditions 
>from depths between 70' and the surface.  Some of the early sport dives in the 
>USA using mixed gases were shown where divers wore 4 or 5 tanks on their body 
>and had a further 4 to 5 tanks strapped to their scooters.  A short 3 minute 
>video clip was shown of Rob Parker, Wes Skyles and Brad Solomon penetrating 
>Wakulla against a 1+1/2 knot current & returning to the habitat.

How times change?

>
>Bill then spent some time reviewing the theory of failure analysis and 
>reliability as applied to existing closed circuit systems (USN Mk15 & Mk16), 
>independent quad tanks, manifolded twin tanks and redundant closed circuit 
>systems (the Cis-Lunar Mk.1 to Mk.5).
>
>An overview of the principal features of the Mk.5 was then given (for those
who 
>missed the workshop).  Additional features which were covered were :
>
>        Head up display 
>
>                Deco LED - has 3 states.Green = no problem,  
>                                        Flashing green = deco stop reached,  
>                                        Red = too shallow

What is this info based upon - tables/algorithm/past data?

>
>                Oxygen LED - has 5 states Green = OK
>                                          Yellow = too high ppO2
>                                          Flashing yellow = too low ppO2
>                                          Red = above 1.6 ppO2
>                                          Flashing red = hypoxic within 5 mins

I trust the 'hypoxic within 5 minutes' is workload/scrubber state
related?

>
>                System LED has 2 states  Green = OK
>                                         Red = Check primary display to
identify 
>                                               system problem

Sounds like this system takes more time checking than would be
safe/usable for survey work?
>
>The Mk.5 is said to have a 6 hour capability at any depth for a typical diver 
>swimming at 20m/min.  At rest a duration of 10 hours would be expected.  It
has 
>a weight of 55 lb. and a volume less than twin 80s.  It can be fully
integrated 
>with a Morgan full face mask incorporating comms.  The gas efficiency against
an 
>open circuit set is typically 56:1.  On board cylinders were 400 cu.ft 
>(oxygen)and 240 cu.ft.(diluent) in size.  The total number of hours spent of 
>Cis-Lunar rebreathers is in excess of 2500 hours.

Hmmmm....   not sure how 400 cu ft of O2 and 240 cu ft of diluent would
look in cylinders ( a rough guess is five 80 cu ft's plus three 80 cu
ft's for diluent) this does not seem compact? 
>
>Bill discussed the original plans to include a CO2 sensor & alarm feature & 
>concluded that with existing technology it was not possible to include an 
>effective CO2 detection capability into the Mk.5 and that this feature had 
>therefore been dropped.

Drager isist that reliable technology is not availble to incorporate
PpO2 control let alone CO2.
 
>  The Mk.5 does however not only record the total time 
>spent using the scrubber since it was last refreshed, it calculates the CO2
that 
>should have been produced from the O2 consumption (assuming no gas loss
through 
>leakage, mask clearing etc.) and incorporates a warning if the scrubber is 
>reaching the limit of its expected duration.

How does this allow for ascents?
>
>The final part of the talk focused on the plans for 'Wakulla 2', Bill Stone's 
>next planned expedition into Wakulla Springs cave system some 10 years after
the 
>original 'Wakulla 1' expedition. 
>
>No mention was made of the on-going  Woodville Karst Plains Project  (WKPP) 
>explorations over the past 10 years, headed by George Irvine and his team of 
>lead divers & support crew.  WKPP are presently exploring Wakulla Springs
using 
>radically different techniques, philosophy and rebreather to that proposed by 
>Bill Stone. 

Hmmmm..... I would suggest that the techniques are different based upon
experience - WKPP always said there would come a point where they would
have to use rebreathers - now they are doing.
> 
>
>The Wakulla 2 expedition is expected to cost around  1.3 million $US with the 
>funding all coming from private sponsors.  The stated objectives are :
>
>        To explore up to 6 km from the entrance,

WKPP are already close.

>
>        To produce a 3D map of the cave system, integrated to surface features 
>with an accuracy of 5cm

WKPP are already producing this.

>
>        To leave no impact on the park at the end of the expedition

WKPP already operate ana weekly basis with little or no impact.
>
>The expedition has developed DPVs (scooters) with a 15 km range which are
about 
>2 x the size of an Aquazepp.   The DPVs use NiMH batteries and the diver will 
>effectively be diving with 3 Mk.5 rebreathers (one on their back and 2
attached 
>to the DPV), giving a possible 18 hour capability.  No staging of open circuit 
>tanks is planned.  One type of DPV incorporates a backup DPV with a 6 km
range. 
> Another model incorporates an automated digital wall mapper in the DPV nose.  
>The mapping system works by using some 64 sonar sensors arrayed in a helical 
>pattern around the nose linked to a 3D inertial guidance system which 
>automatically gives the x,y,z position co-ordinates of the DPV together with
the 
>pitch, roll and yaw aspects.  Scanning position data at a rate of 50 times a 
>second, the entire tunnel cross-section will be automatically mapped to a 5 cm 
>accuracy.  As a backup to correct some known drift problems associated with 
>inertial guidance systems (at worst a drift of 1m in 200m-300m might occur), a 
>sequence of 'drop pods' with flashing LED's will be positioned at regular 
>intervals along the tunnel system.  The light from the LED's will
automatically 
>be detected by the DPV system & any inertial drift corrected. Up to 8 Gb of
data 
>can be stored by each DPV.

OK,OK - now we are on Mars! - All joking apart, for what possible reason
is this technological 'leviathan' way of cracking a relativly simple nut
with a hugely complicated sledghammer all heading towards?. From the
info that has been posted I would be worried about the most tuned team
in the world doing this let alone somebody who is oulicaly asking for
helpers!

>
>The expedition divers are not planning to carry out their dives as in previous 
>'bounce dives' excursions from the surface with in-water or habitat 
>decompression at the end of each dive.  Instead it is planned that lead divers
4 
>of  2x2 man teams will remain in saturation in a surface hyperbaric habitat 
>maintained at a pressure of 55m-65m.  The habitat weighs some 100,000 lb. and 
>will be transported into the entrance region in sections.  The habitat will be 
>located on a floating barge and divers will be transferred to a depth of 55m
in 
>a transfer bell.
>
>One of the principal planned objectives of the expedition is to produce a 
>virtual environment theatre so that the public can experience what it is like
to 
>explore Wakulla Springs.  Visitors will wear 'crystal eyes' LCD shutter
glasses 
>and will be able to experience a full 3D virtual reality show.  

Send a donation to WKPP - see it in real video footage!!!!

>In addition the 
>3D map will be available for scientific aquifer studies to enable tracking of 
>pollutants through the cave system to be modelled.  In fact Bill stated that 
>although he hoped that the known limits of the Wakulla Springs system would be 
>significantly extended, even if no new cave were actually reached but the 3D 
>mapping system worked as planned on the existing known cave then the whole 
>expedition would be considered a 100% success.

Sounds like a cop out clause to me - why prove an experimental cave
mapping system in a situation that involves lots of 'wannabees' in deep
cave?. The cave is already being mapped in fine fashion.
>
>The talk concluded with a short computer animation showing a visualisation of 
>the cave system explored in the original 1987 Wakulla 1 expedition.  A 3D
model 
>was shown which could be rotated, panned and zoomed to display features of the 
>cave system. The Wakulla 2 expedition was expected to involve between 75-100 
>people for periods of 2 weeks or more and an invitation was extended for those 
>interested to contact the project.

SNIP>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Steve thanks for the info.




Regards

 
Chris Hellas         e-mail - chris@de*.de*.co*.uk*
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]