Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
When are you people going to realize that it is useless to argue with a paranoid schizophrenic. The more you egg this guy on, the more we will have to put up with his nonsensical blather. The way to deal with lunatics is to ignore them and they will go away. I think that everyone on the list has pretty much figured out that satterfield has a few screws loose, so lets blow him off and go onto other subjects, for crying out loud. Jim >Subject: Re: proof...Mr. Dwarf the Pinhead howls again !!! >Sent: 3/21/97 8:23 PM >Received: 3/22/97 5:11 PM >From: EliteDive@ao*.co* >To: bdi@wh*.ne* >CC: Tech Diver, techdiver@aquanaut.com > > >You must be joking me, and you had my hopes up. >You have no idea how much I was hoping that you had put some kind of hard >data up. But no, nothing. What would Richard know, I have faxes from ANDI in >OZ HQ that tell me they do not need any text that they have written all of >their own. > >I am surprised that Richard, being the smart fellow I know he is would open >himself up for what is to follow, but since he wants to get involved in the >ball game, it's fine by me I have a big enough file to go around. > >Post some pages of this "Text" specifically the ones you quoted to me in a >post awhile back where you listed specific page numbers, what you have here >now is a crock of crap not eveidence. this will be painfully obvious as soon >as I get some copies of documents from ANDI Austrailia scanned for comparison >with International HQ documents, if it's the truth you are after I will >provide mountains of it and gladly. I will even throw in some of Richard's >recent right hand mans work as well, just for your information. (Paul >Morrall) > >But first, cut the crap and put up some real evidence, Nichols statement is >crap and he knows it. Pinhead, (sorry, pinhead dwarf) you are doing me a >favor with your little project, but my guess is that after this post the boys >in charge will tell you to go home and you will fade back into the far away >backgound where you belong. However, I hope I am wrong, after all you are in >far enough now to where you should see it thru to conclusion. I am glad you >were able to convince someone who may have been heard of to join you in your >quest, as it raises the ante and will make the conclusion all the sweeter. > >Firstly, Richards statement means nothing and here's why: > >1. He states that this is some official ANDI text from 94' when he himself >sat there at DEMA with myself and Paul Morrall and complained how he had >never been provided with materials (such as this text you refer to). In fact >I have in my possesion a copy of ANDI Austrailia's text entitled Technical >SafeAir Diver Instructor Manual, it was rejected by HQ when presented Mr. >Betts then agreed with Richard that he could use that text until he provided >one from HQ. The OZ text has no specific author mentioned but it list the >ANDI Australia copyright on everypage. It is dated 1994 and looks an awful >lot like a PADI text with a few tid bits thrown in. I have the entire text so >Richard should find this hard to deny or explain. ( I will include a few >choice pages from the OZ version for your personal reading pleasure Mr. >Dwarf.) > >2. I re-wrote the text, I never said every word of it, I had to have it ready >by Tek/DEMA so I tried to salvage what was possible and it was not much. In >fact it was my understanding that the oxygen analysis section (hardly a >noteworthy part) was written by Mr. Joe Odom of TDI currently, I did not do >it and did not claim to my copy right list my work in that text exactly to >the page and chart, I assure you those pages are not listed. I can also tell >you that no signifigant section of substance remains and that MY work >comprises easily 90% of the total information input, especially if you >compare the value of the information. > >But, once again you come out shooting in the dark like a desperate fool. > >3. Large protions ? Interesting conclusion, perhaps you might be a little >more detailed . Large protions of a text that did not exist, why don't you >put say 50% of the amount of the pages you claim "existed" up on this page. >In this way I can dispatch you and you cohorts all at once so we can quit >dancing, I don't think you will be very popular. > >In summary, Richard's statement proves nothing except he wants to get a shot, >well I will see what I can do about posting some of his work from the ANDI >Austrailia Technical/ANDI/ PADI text on here and see how everyone likes it >and while I am at it I will certify as to it's origin as well. > >It's no problem, I will do it as a favor to Richard. Maybe it will work out >better than the problems they had with the ANDI Dive Planner and it's >remarkable resemblance to another popular software program as a fine example >of crediability. > >I have a whole sackful of goodies for you who are about to drown in your own >sea of crap. Mr. Dwarf, the thing that is the most bothersome to me is that >you seem to really think all of this is true. Tell me when it is proven to >you that you were totally wrong will you be man enough to come on here and >admit it ? Keep it coming, you are doing a great job. > >TMS -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]