The address you used for the TechDiver list is no longer valid. Since May 1996, the list has been located at AQUANAUT.COM. Please resend your message to one of these addresses: techdiver@aquanaut.com to distribute a post to the list techdiver-request@aquanaut.com for subscribe/unsubscribe requests owner-techdiver@aquanaut.com to reach a human for assistance Thank you. > From owner-techdiver@terra.net Fri Mar 21 14:05:10 1997 > Message-Id: <199703211905.OAA18505@ar*.te*.ne*> > Received: from mailhost.accesscom.net (ux.accesscom.net [204.181.176.2]) > by argali.terra.net (8.8.5/jr2.10) with SMTP > id OAA18505; Fri, 21 Mar 1997 14:05:09 -0500 > Received: from mailhost.accesscom.net by mailhost.accesscom.net; Fri, 21 Mar 97 13:11 CST > X-Sender: premier@ma*.ac*.ne* > X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > To: cavers@ge*.co* > Date: Fri, 21 Mar 97 13:11 CST > From: premier@ma*.ac*.ne* (susan m. innes) > Subject: reg performance 1/2" hose > Cc: techdiver@terra.net > > Does anyone have any information or experience with regard to gas > flow/perforamce of regulators in use at deeper depths (i.e. 200 feet plus) > (on various types of gases) when it comes to using 1/2" vs 3/8" diameter > intermediate pressure hoses? > Does the diameter of the hose affect the performance of the 7-foot > hose primary regulator? > Does the fact that the hose may be 1/2" but that the connection to > the first stage is 3/8"s affect performance or flow? > > bill von hoene > new orleans, la. > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]