Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@santec.boston.ma.us (Tech Divers mailing list)
Subject: Let's be reasonable about deepest dive first
From: William Mayne <mayne@pi*.cs*.fs*.ed*>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 93 15:05:55 EDT
It seems from the recent discussion of the German woman getting
a serious DCS hit that in some cases people are being trained to
consider deepest dive first an inviolable rule. I have maintained
that jumping on that as the primary cause of a hit on the profile
given is not reasonable - especially since there was a much more
serious violation, a rapid ascent from 60 feet, involved.

Let's look at the profile again: 45 feet for 35 minutes, 2.5 hour
surface interval, followed by 60 feet for 35 minutes. First the
difference in depth is only 15 feet. Second a 2.5 hour surface
interval is a nice long time for microbubbles, a concern with
sawtooth profiles, to filter out. Third, is there anyone out there
who thinks she would have been better off going to 60 or 70 feet on
the first dive, for the same length of time, and then doing the same
surface interval and second dive?

Using my Buhlmann tables, 21 meters (70 feet) for 35 minutes makes
her an E diver. A 45 minute surface interval is enough to get that
down to A. Her surface interval was more than three times that long
- long enough to go from G to A. The RNT for an A diver on a dive to
18 meters (60 feet) is 14 minutes, giving 35+14=49 minutes for the
second dive, still within the no-decompression limit (53 minutes).
And this is adding 25 feet to the actual depth of the first dive.

Now put theory aside and apply some common sense. Consider a possible
consequence of being dogmatic about deepest dive first: Diver nature
being what it is, this encourages actually diving deeper on the first
dive, at least dropping down briefly to click in a max depth, to preserve
one's options for later dives. Is this reasonable? Again, is there anyone
who thinks that it would have helped the diver in this incident to have
dropped down to 70 feet rather than staying at 45 on her first dive, other
things being equal? If so I would be most interested in a physiological
explanation.

Bill Mayne

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]