Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 08:38:42 -0600 (CST)
From: atikkan@ix*.ne*.co* (EE Atikkan )
Subject: Fwd: Re: Steel vs. Aluminum for O2 Cylinders
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
At 06:21 PM 3/12/97 -0800, Bob Favorite wrote:
>	  As far as steel vs. Al for O2 the increased O2 content can 
cause
>rusting and the rusting uses up the O2 resulting in decreased pO2.  Al
>will stop rusting once a surface layer of oxidation has formed but 
this is
>not true for steel it will continue to rust until all the metal 
present is
>oxidized. 

It is incontravertible that there exists the potential for 'rusting' if 
steel tanks R used in O2 service.  However rusting (oxidation) requires 
moisture & if tank & gas are perfectly dry, the rx does not proceed @ 
an appreciable rate.  

When pure O2 is in contact with iron & moisture is present, say in a 
steel tank, rusting will diminish the total amount of O2.  If moisture 
is present a steel tank will rust, albeit at a slower rate, even if 
filled with air.

Aluminum does not 'oxidize', that is, combine w/ O2 under the 
conditions that an Al can be exposed to w/o its destruction.  It 
corrodes by forming chlorides of Al.  Thus it is impervious to O2, 
making it a better choice for O2 service.  The 'white' AlClx that is 
occassionally seen in Al tanks indicates that Cl (chlorinated pool 
water, salt (NaCl) water) entered the tank.

Regards

Esat
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]