Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 10:09:22 -0500
From: Don Brown <dbrown@me*.co*>
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: tanks and buoyancy
lenbud@ac*.mo*.ne* wrote:
> 
> The simple way to look at it is that each molecule has a mass and therefore
> a weight in this gravity well called earth.  the high pressure tanks hold
> more molecules in the same volume, and this volume of gasses weighs more at
> the higher pressure (when full) because of the much higher number of
> molecules in the same volume.   This higher density produces more change in
> weight from full to empty, and it results in more of a change in bouyancy
> for the high pressure tanks.
> >
> >
> >At 06:29 PM 2/15/97 -0900, you wrote:
> >>Hello folks:
> >>
> >>I have sitting in front of me the 1997 US Divers catalog and I am looking
> >>at the tank specifications chart.  US Divers now appears to be carrying the
> >>entire Pressed Steel line of low pressure and high pressure tanks as well
> >>as aluminum 80s.  For your reference, I have duplicated parts of the chart
> >>as an ASCII table below (Sorry you metric folks, this probably won't mean
> >>too much)
> >>
> 
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>Tank/Size     LP95    LP104    LP120    HP80    HP102    HP120    AL80
> 
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>PSI           2400    2400     2400     3500    3500     3500     3000
> >>Diameter (in)  8.0     8.0      8.0     7.25    7.25     7.25     7.25
> >>Wt. empty w/o
> >> valve (lbs)    41      46       52       27       33      38       33
> >>Height (in)
> >> (w/valve)    27.3    29.5     33.0     23.0    27.25   30.38     29.0
> >>Buoyancy
> >> full        -4.74   -4.17     -3.8     -8.0     -8.2   -10.0     -1.9
> >>Buoyancy
> >> empty       -1.75    -1.0      0.0     -1.0     +0.5    +1.0     +4.1
> 
>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>What strikes me immediately when viewing this chart is that the change in
> >>buoyancy for low pressure tanks is far less than for high pressure tanks.
> >>According to the chart, each tank changes in buoyancy as follows:
> >>
> >>-----------------------------------
> >>       Buoyancy change from
> >>TANK      full to empty
> >>-----------------------------------
> >>LP95          3
> >>LP104         3.17
> >>LP120         3.8
> >>HP80          7.0
> >>HP102         8.7
> >>HP120        11.0
> >>AL80          6.2
> >>-----------------------------------
> >>
> >>I was under the impression that breathing a set volume of air....say 100 cf
> >>will add the same amount of buoyancy to your tank regardless of the tank
> >>you are using, but I haven't had a physics class for over a decade.  So
> >>unless US Divers blew their own tank specs it appears that the wet volume
> >>of the tank and/or the starting pressure are also factors.  So, I pose the
> >>following questions
> >>
> >>1. Can anyone out there explain the relationship between tank volume, and
> >>buoyancy at various pressures and why low pressure tanks do not change
> >>nearly as much as high pressure tanks when releasing the same volume of air?
> >>
> >>2. Is this one of the reasons that low pressure tanks are so preferred in
> >>cave and tech diving?  The tradeoff seems to be a heavier tank on the
> >>surface for less change in buoyancy.
> >>
> >>3.  And finally, does anyone happen to know the exact buoyancy of aluminum,
> >>steel, and lead in sea water?  In other words, if you are 1 lb positive in
> >>sea water, how many lbs of aluminum, steel, and lead, respectively, would
> >>be required to bring you back to neutral buoyancy.
> >>
> >>Regards,
> >>----------------
> >>Kent Lind
> >>klind@al*.ne*
> >>
> >>
> >>--
> >>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> >>Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
> >>
> >>
> >
> 
> --  The real Handicapped people are the ones that refuse to see their own.  --
> 
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


Perhaps the reason for this change in bouyancy is to to the internal 
volume, the length, and the circumfrence. If you look at the equation 
for the area of a cylinder, then perhaps the change in bouyancy is a 
function of the displacement of water by air. As with any bouyancy, 
there is a pos. a neg. and a neutral. If you look at the height, the 
diameter, and the volume of air, that can give clues. Also, a factor to 
consider, is how much lift does the empty tank create? Also, is the 
weight of the tank a counterbalance to any bouyancy properties? What is 
the minimum reccomended amount of air remaining? Etc.. That may shed 
some light on this subject...

A 2000 psi 100 lb tank that is 35" tall and 10" dia. Would probably sink 
even full. Whereas a 2000 psi tank weighing 25 lbs. of the same dia and 
height would probally exhibit positive bouyancy in this example.

Dbrown.. 

I'm no expert, but this seems to make sense.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send list subscription requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]