Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 18:03:48 -0500
To: techdiver@terra.net
From: techvid@ne*.co* (Brown, Christopher)
Subject: risk
Finally, Paul Pretorius brought up the *actual* topic of the pissing
contests we see all the time on the diving lists: risk management. Others
have a sense of it, some have used the word "risk" in trying to develop
explanations and arguments, but Paul, in his highly perceptive post,
actually said the magic word and wins the cigar.

Here's the best line in his recent post:

"Having said that, how many of us on here have the experience to determine
the risk and probabilities accurately?"

Risk management, perceived risk, acceptable risk, target risk --  slippery
subjects, very hard to discuss because they are difficult aspects of human
psychology -- always get drowned in urine-soaked disagreements, with
everyone involved compounding the problem by thinking all the while that
it's a disagreement over *safety*.

Safety is what we're going for, certainly -- and the answers may be in the
details -- but the *point* of the effort is always *risk management*.

Often there's a long discussion over something as silly as "which hand
should I use to open the buckle on my harness -- and would someone please
create a web site showing me how?"

Then there are the gear config. battles. How about the recent independent
/manifold thread? That was really fun: sometimes independents are "OK" --
when they are used as "stages" -- or "sidemounts". Then they're not OK --
when used as "back-mounts". But your gas management -- and the risk
management that guides it -- are varying all over the place. Applications,
techniques, and configs. *change* -- but doing the best you can to manage
the risk,to maximize safety -- is *always* the primary goal. It never
changes. But then, if you use 121's you're an idiot. Yet, if you use them
as bail-outs for a rebreather, you're smart. What a bunch of silt.

The *nomenclature* for a tank of gas changes *as its application
changes*:"stage", "sidemount", "bail-out", "primary" -- and as the
application changes, it does so according to the *risk management* needs --
of the *individual* using the gear -- and making the *particular* dive.
Yet, as seen in the indep./manif. thread, there was no allowance for the
variables of risk management.

Then we get into "experience" questions, number of dives,
attitude/psychological states, male vs. female, training, physical cond.,
etc., etc. -- in *every* case, the real issue is *risk management*. No
matter what you do, or don't do, wear or don't wear, what kind of
environment you dive, how deep you go, how far you penetrate -- whatever --
it all comes down to *individual* modes of risk management. And individuals
are as different as snowflakes. "Personal preference" is a term, always
used derisively on the net, which simply describes  multiple and varying
levels of individuals' *risk management* ability -- something that changes
(hopefully improves) constantly for responsible divers.

Risk management is even at the core of the ubiquitous catch-phrases such as
"Rule #1", "use the long hose", etc. And Rich Pyle's ""WHATEVER happens is
COMPLETELY and ENTIRELY your own responsibility!"

The ultimate effect (benefit) of these discussions, ideally, would be that
each of us evaluates the info we find according to *personal, realistic*
risk management assessment -- instead of tunnel-vision nit-picking, pissing
contest ball-clacking, etc.

Discussions of gear, system designs, training, organizations -- everything
-- have the fundamental, but rarely addressed, question of risk management
that doesn't  get adressed. I hope in coming discussions it's a subject
that gets the focus/interest/analysis that, IMHO, it deserves/needs.

That way, pissing contests can be saved for beer parties, risk can be
minimized for everyone, and we all become better divers.

Quiz: name the *only* diving apparatus that guarantees you the chance to
massage your gums and provides an *unlimited* breathing mix supply when
used properly.

A: Denta-Snork, of course!





Christopher A. Brown
The Technical Diving Video Library (TDVL)
 http://www.neuro.fsu.edu/dave/docent.htm
(US & Canada): 1-800-373-7222
Outside US:904-942-7222  Fax:904-942-1240

Life is short -- this is not a rehearsal.



Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]