Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 1997 23:07:10 +1100
To: <Tennantm@ao*.co*>
From: anscott@hi*.ne*.au*
Subject: Re: SOLO: manifold or not
Cc: techdiver@terra.net

So Mike you must be saying the opposite i.e That you shouldn't use
independants for solo diving.
C'mon - get a grip, don't be so extremist and just admit that if used
correctly independants can be safer when solo diving, or perhaps youre going
'troppo' your self.

Scott

At 18:08 12/01/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Troppo
>
>So what you are sying is that for someone to be "Hogarth" while diving solo,
>they must dive independents.  Yes, that is what you are saying.
>
>
>Here is what you wrote to me:
>
>>>>>START:
>>Mike
>
>>you say you use a hogathian rig for NE solo wreck
> >dives. This shows you have no clue as true 
>> hogathian rigged divers use a manifold primarily 
> >for GAS SHARING.
> 
> >You need to read Jarrods paper on hogathian,
> >then you will see the light: solo diving is
> >an exeption to the manifold syndrome and you need
> >to use INDEPENDENTS in your environment to DO IT 
> >RIGHT. (that is if you can manage your gas- if 
> >you can't take option number 1: don't dive).
> 
> >remember- DO IT RIGHT or don't do it at all.
> 
> >troppo
> 
> >PS stop doing it wrong
>
>>>>END
>
>
>And I say you are full of shit, Troppo.  That would mean  (according to your
>philosophy) any time a diver goes into a wreck or a cave solo that they are
>not Hogarth if they are diving a manifold, and they are "DOING IT WRONG" (as
>you said).  Cave or wreck isn't the issue here, you clearly made the isuue
>one of solo diving and manifolds.  YOU said that the primary  reason for
>having a manifold in the Hogarth system is for air sharing and since you are
>solo you are not air sharing, and therefore should dive independents;
>otherwise you are "Doing it Wrong".  Troopo you are such a stupid fuck.  You
>are killing me.  I am rolling on the floor, help me I can't get up.  Get a
>clue!!  
>
>So Troppo, you are saying that George and even JJ himself is (in you own
>words) "Doing it Wrong" when they solo dive with a manifold.   Yeah, right.  
>
>Again Troppo writes:
>
>>at least stick to your point: are you hogarth
>>or not. 
>
>Hogarth, what other way is there?  
>
>>JJ himself has written that solo is 
>>an exeption to blanket usage of manifolds.
>
>Blanket was the term.  Where did it say if you dive solo and use a manifold
>you aren't diving a Hogarth rig, and therefore are "Doing it Wrong"?  It
>didn't!!
>
>>You say you will have all your gas if a 
>>reg fails you will not: you will have all
>>less the gas you lose  while turning the 
>>valve off.
>
>Point taken.  
>
>>You say you are better off with all your gas;
>>maybe but I would rather have half of mine
>
>I will still have more than half of mine, and more than what you would have.
> But, you said you didn't care...you would RATHER have less gas than you
>could have.  That is what you just said.  
>
>>(more than enough) 
>
>Not neccessarily.  You are making the assumption the everything will go
>smoothly on the way out.  In a high stress situation, things NEVER go as
>planned.  Furthermore, ever the most carefuly planned and routine dive can
>turn into a dive from hell with out warning.  
>
>>than possibly none at all
>>like you if the manifold fails.
>
>How many manifold failures have there been where someone lost ALL their gas
>and died?  The manifold is NOT going to break unless you are doing 60 MPH and
>slam into something, taking your head off in the process.  
>
>>You say that with half of my gas I might not
>>have enough; while I am not the best I've
>>seen mostly I will finish with more in one 
>>tank than manifold divers have all together.
>
>Is the other one empty? ;-)
>
>That is more of an indication of the diver and not a falacy of the rig.  Get
>real!  Come over here and dive with JJ or G-.  ;-)  Ask them why they don't
>dive BACK MOUNTED INDEPENDENTS while SOLO diving.  Unless ofcourse, you are
>doing a much shorter dive then the others are.  That would explain why you
>use less gas.  
>
>>I beleive independents can be a simpler rig.
>
>Simple, maybe.  Simpler, not a chance.  Independents have one more hose and
>they are NOT redundant (you can NOT access your TOTAL gas supply via either
>reg for air sharing or first stage failure.....bottom line end of story!).
> Furthermore, you are FORCED to switch regs with independents for propper gas
>management.  This something that is not done with a manifold unless sharing
>air, and even then you don't keep switching back and forth.  Not that
>switching back and forth should be a problem because it is done all the time
>as a basic skill, but it is one more thing you HAVE to do and one more thing
>to clusterfuck up in a high stress situation.  You say since you are "solo
>diving" sharing air does not apply to you.  That is bullshit.  You logic is
>messed up.  Although, it MAY not be likely that you end up sharing air on a
>solo dive, the potential ALWAYS exists that you will see another diver on
>most dives and posibly have to share air.  Some places you will have higher
>potential of running into another diver than others, but there still is a
>chance while solo diving you will have to share air.  So, why are you tyring
>to make it harder on yourself to share air if the event arrises?
>
>>troppo   
>
>>PS eat my shorts
>
>Only if they are cotton, that polyester shit hurts my throat.  
>
>Mike
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>
>




Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]