Le 2 Jan 97 @ 16:59, Mark Welzel =E9criv=EEt sur "Re: Doing it Right (or I wanna be a": > Hi Alex, I see your point but can't a ROV be down longer or > virtually indefinitely? They use them all the time commercially and ... > You can send a ROV into smaller openings, down into deeper > depths, further along the system and they can stay down ... > Another point to consider is that the data retrieved from > an ROV would not be biased by the diver and would be available > to any necessary persons or agencies in its unadulterated form. How could a ROV perform accurate surveys? By carrying an inertial navigation platform? How accurate are those anyways? > As far as entanglements I will admit I know little of the inside of > caves. Perhaps you could have tender ROV's watching the cable for > the "push" machine? Aren't there ROVs who carry the spool of cable, unrolling it behind them (=E0 la cable-laying ship), instead of dragging it all over the place and risk catching it somewhere, or worse, causing a cave-in? How big the cable need be? You only need two big power cables, and two or three fiber optics for the data/video/control. > I would think that this might be worthy of further investigation > especially if you were seriously interested in mapping cave systems. > Not as glamorous as doing yourself, but definitely safer. I guess it > would depend on the objectives of those involved. Designing a good ROV to do that should be as much fun as diving the cave itself, I guess. --------------- Pour la Republique Francaise du Quebec ------------------- In the French version of "2001: A Space Odyssey", the last word uttered by HAL is "GOD"... ~~ Derniere plongee/last dive: Canal Soulanges (glace/icy) 96.12.31, 5m ~~ Marc Dufour - [\] ACUC6 31874 - TDI CD-0197 - http://www.accent.net/emdx
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]