> Rich, like I told Petie - don't read it . You can tell what to read and what not > to - I know exactly which ones of yours to read - the stuff I am interested in, > or the stuff the relates to things you and I are both familiar with. I don't > read your cis lunar stuff, for example, but that is identifiable , and I am sure > there are plenty of people who find this interesting . I have a key that moves O.K., then let's make a pact: no sneaking diamonds inside dirt. If the post is a slam, then keep it a slam all the way through; don't put any good stuff in it. I'll do the same. Also, no changing subjects part-way through the post. I delete everything having to do with lights, drysuits, and scooters. If I ever need to know anything about these things, I know who to contact (incidently, if and when I do write to you on these topics, please give me some slack if I ask questions that you have answered a thousand times on the list, because I will have missed it. I'll give you the same courtesy for questions about 'breathers, if and when you are ever interested). If we follow these two rules, we can read the first few sentence and know with confidence whether or not we can delete it without missing any good stuff. That way, signal to noise ratio won't be a problem anymore. Rich P.S. If it's going to be a high-humor slam, make that clear in the first couple of sentences.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]