Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@santec.boston.ma.us
Subject: Computer-related DCI
From: phil@wi*.es*.ed* (Phil Pfeiffer)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 1993 12:35:45 -0400
Reima -

Interesting that you should raise the subject of dive-computer-related DCI 
in this group.  Earlier this spring, I posted a message to rec.scuba about 
apparent cases of DCI that I had contracted from repetitive diving that 
were within the limits of a computer.  I received a series of informative 
replies from various people, including Bill Mayne and Dr. Guy Dear--the 
assistant medical director for DAN.  The general consensus seemed to be that 
basing multi-day dive profiles on computers could be hazardous to one's health.
At the risk of boring other more knowledgeable divers, I'm tacking my summary 
of their replies onto the end of this note.  The summary also contains material
on DCI that's not directly relevant to the original request, but interesting.

People who have already seen this message should simply ignore the balance.
Thanks for being patient with my use of bandwidth.


-- Phil

P.S.:  Disclaimer: I have done no technical diving whatsoever, and am not
qualified to do anything other than to report my experiences, or other's
people's good advice.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------


This is a longish summary of the key comments in the notes that I received
in response to my queries on DCI, in chronological order.

******************************************************************************
***                                                                        ***
***   Comments by the Assistant Medical Director of Dan, Dr. Guy Dear      ***
***   [MB FRCA (NOAA trained)] who responded last, appear after helpful    ***
***   comments by the three others who responded.                          ***
***                                                                        ***
******************************************************************************

Dr. Dear originally meant to post directly to the net, but the postings
miscarried, and ended up in my e-mailbox.  I have edited (rearranged) the
contents of his two notes to me to make them flow better, but I have not,
I believe, changed the substance of his remarks.  By the way, let me publicly
thank Dr. Dear for taking time to compose a gracious and considered reply
to to my earlier, unhappy posting.

------

from Knut Hunstad  (Norway):

      [Knut, in an earlier posting, observed that Norwegian training agencies
       recommended limiting one's diving to 2 dives per day.  I then responded
       that I hadn't heard this before.]

      In response to a comment that my certification courses predated the
      era of heavy repetitive diving, and warnings about making >2 dives/day:

     "I have been diving since 1981 and didn't learn this myself until 3 years
      ago....  Our tables actually go even further than mentioned before, as
      they state that after several (3-4) days of diving 2 times a day you
      should take one day off (no diving at all below 9')! ... A typical dive
      here includes a lot more strain than in warmer places, cold weather
      (and water), more wind, more gear etc. I don't know if this affects the
      dive tables in any way, it just came to my mind... "

      Knut said the information on repetitive was mentioned in a somewhat
      obscure place in the Norwegian book of dive tables.

      <Some good advice from Knut about risks inherent in stretching the
       tables omitted.>

------

     On the subject of the risks of diving with a PFO
     (i.e.: a hole between the two large chambers of the heart, a condition
      that I have):

      "My personal literature reviews on the subject, as well as having
       witnessed the flow of microemboli across the atrial septum in a clinical
       setting,  leads me to believe that diving should be discouraged in
       patients with PFO.  There are several articles on the subject in a
       recent set of abstracts from an Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine
       symposium."

------

from <individual who did not give permission to quote>,  (USA):

      I mentioned that I let the Oceanic DataMax get into the Yellow on
      one of my dives ....

      "I dive with a DataMax, and I won't surface until I get the meter at
       LEAST two pixels into the green.  In general, I treat it as if there
       were at LEAST two or three more pixels lit than actually are ....  BTW,
       the ability to define your own safety margins in terms of saturation
       rather than time is one of the DataMax's advantages."

      On a remark about using nitrox for an extra margin of safety:

       "Phil Sammet, the captain of the Cypress Sea out of Monterey, dives
        with a pony bottle of Nitrox and switches to it at about 50 feet on
        ascent.  He still dives a conservative air table.  I'm considering
        the same thing."

      >>>
      >>> Also received stronger comments in support of nitrox and oxygen
      >>> from a person with a great dea of expertise in technical diving.
      >>>

      On PFO:  ".... there is certainly a body of evidence that those with it
       are more susceptible to DCS.  There was a great description of how it
       could affect DCS in either Alert Diver or Rodale's in the last couple of
       months.  Based on that description, I suspect a small PFO could be even
       worse than a large one (PERSONAL OPINION) because of the higher fluid
       velocities through the hole."

      >>  This person could not find the article in question in Rodale's
      >>  after rechecking.

>Finally, from Dr. Guy Dear,  DAN:

     "To briefly answer your points and also to indicate that we do monitor
      Rec.Scuba please peruse!!"

     *.  About DAN phone protocols:

         DAN always asks for names because this allows them to call back in
         case of a disconnect.  DAN gets calls from all over the world with
         differing phone systems, including ship to shore radios, etc.

         DAN asks for the profiles and the numbers of dives because these
         are "important clues as to the amount of nitrogen load as well as
         the probability of DCI in your case."

         DAN does not make formal diagnoses by phone.  Furthermore, DAN will
         give advice about profiles over the phone.  "The EMTs that in general
         answer the phone to more than 12000 people per year cannot give much
         information about symptomatology.  This is not to say that anyone
         who does have current specific symptoms will be ignored for those are
         just the divers we want to refer on to an MD."

         In short:
          "We can and do refer interested divers to knowledgeable physicians."


     *.  Reasons for DAN's concerns about discussing profiles and making
         diagnoses by phone:

         "No one yet has hard data on the risks of DCI for sport divers....
          Really, DAN is not able to answer in great detail specific questions
          about the likelihood of DCI in certain situations."

         "No diving physician or EMT can make a formal diagnosis over the
          phone.... It is important not to attempt self diagnosis, though
          an index of suspicion should be raised.  Many divers are not aware
          of subtle neurological deficits which may be found on careful
          examination."

      *.  General comments on diving-related risks, and particularly on PFO:

          "Nearly 50% or more of divers bubble after diving if carefully
           examined (Dunfrd et al UBR 1991 18(s) p62) and the % increases
           with deeper dives.  These are mostly asymptomatic of course.
           We don't know of the long term sequel to all these bubbles but
           it seems from examination of various organs notably spinal cord
           and long bones that there may be unnoticed continual damage which
           is a worrying thought."

          "Inference[s] [regarding the safety of deep, repetitive diving]
           can be made from examination of data from the development of the
           PADI Wheel, from the UK and Norway.  DAN's own data recorded in
           the annual Report on Diving Accidents & Fatalities (Similar data
           available from BSAC HQ) in dicates that repetitive dives (>2 day)
           deeper than 80 ft were associated with an increased risk."

          "PFO (Patent Foramen Ovale interATRIAL hole in the heart) though
           apparently asymptomatic increased the risk by 4-5 times."

          "As regards tables or computers, all artificial aids have to assume
           that all divers are the same.  [This is] not likely!!  There can
           then be an implied acceptance of risk of DCI.  New tables are being
           created using the Maximum Likelihood techniques used by Vann and
           Weathersby etc.  To do this data is needed on [safe] as well as
           Bending dives....  At present noone knows the incidence of DCI as
           no one knows how many divers make how many dives a year and
           especially how many cases of MILD DCI never get reported!!!"

     *.  Comments about DCI and mild DCI:

          "Any of the general texts such as Diving Medicine (Bove), Physiology
           & Medicine of Diving (Bennett & Elliott), Diving & Subaquatic
           Medicine (Edmonds) give good info on the signs and symptoms of DCI."

          "Mild DCI may resolve and like the posted message about the diver
           [i.e., yours truly] with skin bends (sounded like Cutis Marmorata)
           often will go away by themselves.  This does not mean that the
           problem has resolved however.  Whatever the lesion in the body that
           gives the symptoms of DCI may have just recovered enough to allow
           for resolution of the symptoms but is just waiting for the next last
           straw to cause a catastrophe.  Repetitive dives in this situation
           are not a good idea.  Subtle symptoms may develop into more serious
           ones later and mild symptoms should NOT be ignored.  The files at
           DAN are full of divers who had minor problems initially.  Research
           is now going on to try to link onset with outcome."

          "I think that anyone who had what sounded like an episode of DCI (of
           whatever nature) should talk to a knowledgeable MD before diving
           again.  An examiination at this stage  [when this was written, two
           weeks after the incident reported on USENET] would be unlikely
           to reveal anything unless you have residual neurological symptoms.
           Detailed studies of the brain and spinal cord may show damage but
           this is a little controversial.  Ask about CT, MRI and SPECT imaging
           if you want to know more."

          "I doubt that anyone would give recommended profiles bearing in mind
           liability problems.  However I recommend to any divers that have
           suffered a previous DCI that they dive much more conservatively
           in future.  Conservative I believe means shallow, short and few!!!"

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]