Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: Solo@900fsw?
From: <scuba@uc*.be*.ed*>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 1994 03:31:51 -0700
     on 6/25 - Wayne says
>  As I see it, scuba dives in the extreme ranges (350+) are basically solo=
 dives regardless of the communications, surface based support, or presence=
 of other divers......Suppose I'm at 900 fsw in some remote area of the=
 world and run into trouble.

Ok, I can't resist any longer.  If you're sick of this topic please don't=
 read any further.  *This is not a flame, just a rant and rave.

What in gods name are you doing at 900fsw?  At that depth you are not a=
 sport diver, you are an astronaut.  Your dependence on equipment is total. =
 There is NO escape.  You either have total redundancy as well as a=
 pre-planned response to all possible equipment failures, or a good living=
 will.  But if you insist on solo diving in this environment, I won't stop=
 you....hell, I might even say a few kind words about you at the appropriate=
 time...;/

Cousteau describes in his book, The Silent World, why he developed/adopted=
 the buddy system as a diving rule.  One of his divers, Falco I believe, was=
 solo penetrating a wreck when his air intake hose became entangled in a=
 razor sharp edge of some rusted part of the wreck.  It took him over a half=
 an hour to free himself, and he nearly ran out of air.  He realized how=
 close to death he potentially was in any diving situation.  If he were=
 diving with a buddy, it would of been a trivial problem.  After that=
 incident, the Cousteau group decided to always use the buddy system. =
 Simply put, you can not foresee, prevent, nor escape every potential=
 problem that can develop while diving, and a dependable, competent buddy=
 greatly increases your chances (but doesn't eliminate) of surviving=
 unexpected catastrophes.  Equipment failure does not necessarily cause all=
 diving accidents, and all the redundant tanks in the world won't help you=
 in every situation.

Yes, I agree that an undependable, incompetent, risk taking, and just plain=
 stupid buddy can be more of a risk/liability than none.  Diving with a=
 buddy however, does NOT mean being dependent on them.  You should be=
 confident, independent, and totally self sufficient before you dive, buddy=
 or no.  If you are dependent on your buddy, and they need your help, then=
 you will be helpless and worthless to them and yourself.  The real problem=
 it would seem, is how to find a buddy with skills at least equal to your ow=
n.

IMO, there are two major divisions of technical divers, commercial, and=
 recreational.  Professionals feed their families & earn their living by=
 diving and generally spend huge amounts of time in these hazardous types of=
 situations.  They demand every possible safety precaution be taken, don't=
 unnecessarily operate alone or without some type of communication/surface=
 support.  They know that given enough time underwater, every possible thing=
 that can go wrong, will, and given a little more time, even some impossible=
 things will go wrong.  I know of a commercial diver who had his lifeline=
 (airline) severed by a passing boat propeller, and another diver who=
 experienced an underwater earthquake. (Good visibility everywhere one=
 second, total absolute zero vis everywhere the next, and a 100 foot instant=
 sideways ride.)  You can't plan for or avoid these types of things, and I,=
 personally, believe in having a reliable buddy - just in case.  (Don't ask=
 me where to find them, there is no easy way.)  I also prefer to dive within=
 no-deco limits, where I can shed any piece of equipment I have, such as my=
 tank/reg, (and only air supply), and walk, er, swim, away unscathed (free a=
scend).

I think Mark Twain said it best with - "Each person is born to one=
 possession which outvalues all his others - his last breath."


  Re:  Rapid Field Neurological Exam:
One important point about the string concerning the neurological exam for=
 possibly bent divers:  Never allow the suspected bent diver take any=
 aspirin or other pain killers, since it is important for them to be able to=
 describe their symptoms while undergoing treatment by doctors.


&  -tab-  asked about accident/incident reports...Check back issues of=
 Undercurrents (an interesting dive rag/zine that accepts no industry=
 advertising).  They have been running a series called "Why divers die" - a=
 study of the various causes of accidents.


Mark L.
"Hope springs eternal - from the well of fools" - me
"Diviner than dolphin is nothing yet created" - Oppion

*The preceeding statements were solely my opinions, and not professional adv=
ice.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]