> >> > >>Is that conclusion based on just theory, or do you have something more > >>substantial to go on? If the latter, I'd like to hear about it. Or, do > >>you just mean it's better because you can start the O2 deeper? > >> > >>Rich > >> > We could add that by staying deeper, it is easier to prevent bubble > formation (you know, the reason for deep stops?;). Off gasing efficiency is > constant regardless of the depth while breathing O2. So the deeper you can > stay (limited by O2 toxicity), the better it is. That's what sentence number two of my post was referring to. I was asking George about advantages over and above that. He told me some bovine excriment about uniform pressure over the body, and some other more useful stuff. The problem with the "theoretical" advantages is that you can argue it "theoretically" either way. I could say that very high PO2s leads to vasoconstriction and thus reduced perfusion (and reduced offgassing), but being immersed does the same thing. Which is the over-riding factor? I dunno....and I actually don't care. What I'm interested in are the anecdotal and insightful experiences that people like George can offer after trying this sort of thing. Lately I'm becoming a bigger believer in looking at what really works, rather than trying to predict what works based on our meager understanding of all the factors involved. > The DCIEM recommend only their SurD O2 (table 3) table for extreme exposure > dives. This involves decompression at a constant depth of 40 feet in a > chamber, once a 30 feet stop is completed in-water. Their in-water O2 > decompression table (table 2) involves decompression at a constant depth of > 30 feet (with helmet). For most of us, they adapted table 2 so it involves > O2 decompression at a depth of 20 feet (table 2m). > > I talked about that with Ron Nishi (DCIEM) a few years ago. He explained me > that bubbles have less chances to form as you stay deeper. For myself, I > always pull my 10 feet stop to 15-20 feet. I always "clear" my deco time at 20 feet or deeper, and this seems to be an important factor in my experience. I have a lot of respect for Ron, but I'm less and less enthusiastic about speklatin' what the underlying mechanisms are anymore - we just don't know enough yet. Aloha, Rich
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]