Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 30 Jul 1996 13:56:12 +1100
From: Guy Wittig <wittig@sh*.de*.co*>
To: techdiver@terra.net
Subject: RE: Diverite Superwings
Thanks George, 

I thought that might be your opinion, but as I don't do the kind of diving 
that you do I'm happy to take a less extreme position. You see, I do it for 
fun.

I would like to see your video though. Do you know if any PAL versions have 
gone to Australia ? Can I order a PAL version from WKPP ?

P.S. I have an old Fenzy too - what do you think of them ? 

Regards,

Guy.

----------
From: 	gmiiii@in*.co*[SMTP:gmiiii@interserv.com]
Sent: 	Monday, 29 July 1996 9:31
To: 	Guy Wittig; techdiver@terra.net
Subject: 	Re: Diverite Superwings


  When are you guys going to learn? You got a good deal - just like from a 
hooker - what you paid for - "fucked", as the hooker would say. Going 
diving? 
Get real gear, and quit listening to strokes. 

   The cord is bullshit, and if you can not control buoyancy with real 
wings, 
quit diving. Look at my video - there is no way you can control your 
buoyancy 
that well with anything but the proper wings.

    If you do break the wings, and tehy are bound with cord, they wil force 
the 
air out. Only a real moron would put elastic on wings. Only a rocket 
scientist 
wold hav etrouble with the concept of pressure exerted by bondae cords 
against a 
relief valve. I out out a warning bulletin on thise pieces of shit, mainly 
the 
OMS crap, for the NACD after they foujnd that guy on the floor of a rack 
quarry 
with fully inflated bondage wings stuck to the bottom.

     Crap like this may look real smart to you, and convolutions like 
double 
wings may sound real good as well, but if you dive the right gear for the 
situation, none of this is necessary - only a stroke would do otherwise, 
and 
only a storke would add one piece of useless gear to make up for using 
another. 
- G

On Sun, 28 Jul 1996, Guy Wittig <wittig@sh*.de*.co*> wrote:
>I just got a Diverite Transpac with superwings on the weekend. (I 
>got a good deal.)
>
>I guess these are what George calls "bondage wings". 
>
>I have a few questions which someone may be able to offer an opinion on.
>
>I mainly do deep air (<60m !) wreck dives with deco mixes in stage bottles, 
>and with a wetsuit - hence the need for twin bladders.
>
>The Superwings are bound with shock cord. If you inflate them
>the shock cord applies so much pressure that the over pressure
>release blows off at what I would guess is only 1/2 full. That
>would still be over 40lbs lift but it doesn't seem to make a lot
>of sense.
>
>On the positive side it seems to me that:
>1. If I remove the shockcord the wings are a little on the huge side,
>   so the shock cord keeps them tight stops them getting damaged in 
>   wrecks etc. 
>2. The shockcord stops the air forming a large bubble at the top (or
>   bottom if you are head down) and the better air distribution means 
>   better weight/boyancy distribution.
>3. If the shockcord let the wings expand properly it is probably more
>   of a plus than a minus.
>
>A possibility could be to use thinner more compliant shock cord which
>would allow the wings to expand better.
>
>Anyone else use these and had a look at this "feature" ?
>
>Guy.
>
>
>   
>
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'.
>Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'.
>
>

George M. Irvine III
DIR WKPP
1400 SE 11 ST Ft Lauderdale, FL 33316
954-493-6655 FAX 6698
Email gmiiii@in*.co*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]