Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <Tennantm@ao*.co*>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 23:46:01 -0400
To: techdiver@terra.net
cc: adb@he*.re*.or*
Subject: re: Great Lakes viz
Andy 

You wrote:


I just got back from a weekend in Kingston, and we were getting that sort
of awesome visibility.  For the first time ever, I actually saw the whole
Munson from one vantage point.  I don't think the warmth ran quite that
deep; there was a decent thermocline around 45', but deco was in nice
warm water.

In a way it doesn't make sense: a few weeks ago when we were doing the
Morrell and the Dundenberg (Lake Huron, just off the Michigan "thumb"),
upstream of a lot of the civilization in the Great Lakes watershed, out
of sight of land, the viz sucked, but right at the downstream end of the
bottom lake, only about a klick offshore, we get great viz.  Those zebra
mussels must sure suck a lot of shit out of the water, because they're
the only reason I can think of for Kingston having the better viz.  Now
if the little buggers could just leave the wrecks alone, we'd have
something going.

-- 
Anthony DeBoer                                  

End:

Yeah, the Munson is a great wreck isn't it.  The vis always seems to be
alittle bit better down in Kingston (not much) than down river, but you
usually hit a thermocline between 20 - 40 feet.  The thremocline moves deeper
as the summer progresses and the water warms up.  I was on the Keystorm and
the America in Chippewa Bay last weekend and the temp was 66 at depth, 70 on
the surface.  I haven't been down to Kingston since early June when  we hit
the Aloha, Munson, KPH, and Wolfe Islander.  All nice dives. The thermocline
was at 22 feet then, and the bottom temp was somewhere in the 50's [heat wave
compared to March and April].  

It is certainly great when you can see the entire wreck from one point.  I
did the O'Connell in April and could see the whole thing at 150 without a
light, but it was 35 F.  Dove it in May and needed a light just to see past
100, but it had warmed up to the low 40's by then.  

The vis is a function of several things....temp, algae blooms, current, and
ofcourse those little critters (Zebra mussels).  In April the vis was around
130 -150 in Alex Bay with little current, while out by Rock Island (still in
Alex Bay) the vis dropped down to 80 - 100 and the current was significant.
 As the temp increased, the vis decreased, but the Zebra mussels keep it
better than what it has been in years past (so I am told, have only been up
there since May of 95).  The Zebra mussels are a pretty controversial topic
depending on who you talk to.  Divers think they are great from a vis point
of view, and a pain in the ass as they encrust everything and slice the shit
out out your suit and gloves.  I use Kevlar  palm  gloves now and they hold
up pretty well.   As far as clearing up the water, the Zebra mussels do that
just fine.  In fact, that is one of the biggest complaints from fishermen and
biologists.  Since they are filter feeders, they compete with filter feeding
fish.  If you decimate the filter feeder population you will also decrease
the predatious fish population, namely game fish (bass, pike, walleye, and
muskies).  I don't know how much of an effect they really have on the fish
population, that would make a great Thesis.  However, I do know how many fish
I see on every dive and I can't believe you can actually go fishing and NOT
catch anything.  I actually pop open Zebra mussels and feed the fish on deco.
 Just something to pass the time.  The Zebra mussels also have an on going
war with industry by clogging intake pipes.  That creates new jobs for divers
and increases the cost of operation.  So, are they good or evil?  Both I
suppose, I do know they do wonders for the vis.  


Mike

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]