Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 08 Jul 96 18:08:14 EDT
From: John 015 <CC015012@BR*.br*.ed*>
Subject: Re: Chaos and DCI. Was CCRs and the *right..
To: techdiver@terra.net

>Posted on 8 Jul 1996 at 17:44:56 by Scott Cherf
>
>Re: Chaos and DCI.  Was CCRs and the *right..
>
>Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 10:47:42 -0700
>From: cherf@ci*.co* (Scott Cherf)
>
>At 1:03 AM 7/8/96, John 015 wrote:
>
>>I have arguments for why the growth of a bubble is a system
>>in or very near equilibrium.  Before I go on I'd like to
>>know how you'd solve the *non-equilibrium* problem you pose.
>>Say I want to know what the distribution of N2 is 10 seconds
>>after the dividing wall is removed.  Just how would you
>>solve it using statistical mechanics ?
>
>The method I would use would be to arrange the system in it's
>initial state (all the O2 on one side of the box, all the N2 on
>the other) then use the Metropolis equations to cycle through the
>configurations until minimum energy/maximum entropy was achieved
>(equilibrium) at some fixed temperature.
>
>See:
>
>  Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N., Teller A.H. and
>  Teller E. 'Equations of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines',
>  Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA.


I agree that the socalled Monte Carlo method will show a system
approaching equilibrium but the difficulty posed was one of the
*rate* of change.

We've already discussed this in private.  I didn't realize
you also posted but I have nothing further to add.

John

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]