> By far the greatest limitation to CO2 extraction by any canister system is > getting the CO2 (expired) gas to actually make contact with active > absorbent pellets. You can calculate that theoretic amount of CO2 that > will be absorbed by the weight and chemical composition of the absorbent, > but channeling (which may be realted to how the canister is filled) and > canister design greatly affect the "life" of the absorbent. When you say "amount of CO2" above, do you mean the total number of CO2 molecules, or do you mean a RATE of absorbtion (i.e., number of molecules per given unit of time)? > Drager has a rubber gasket that is placed in the middle of the canister > half way through the fill process to limit the channeling that may occur > at the absorbent/canister interface. This doesn't prevent channeling in > the material itself. Dragersorb is different in consistancy from Sodasorb > etc., with less dust and different sized pellets. I think these factors > have a far greater effect on the life of a canister than variance between > divers in CO2 production given that you abide by the manufacturer's > usually very conservative 'sorb use tables. Dragersorb is about 2.7 L per > fill and is rated for (I think) four hours. I agree that the size/shape/packing of the pellets or granules of absorbent, and the size/shape/design of the canister have a huge influence on absorbtion efficiency, but I was saying that if you hold those things constant, you can still get a two to tenfold difference in actual canister duration depending on workload and diver metabolizm. How can a manufacturer give a rating for a canister life in terms of hours of diving when there can be such a huge variation in consumption? My suggestion is to key canister life to O2 consumed (when possible), rather than hours diving. Rich
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]