Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Having read several messages related to the fundraiser for a decompression chamber to serve Misqito Indians, I wish to challenge the underlying assumption or your mission -- i.e. that a chamber will be of benefit to this community. Here is a synopsis of the situation as I understand it: Having depleted the lobster population that is in freediving range (no scuba, max 80-100 feet), the Misqito Indians have been obtained scuba equipment so that they can go deeper for the lobster. Not being properly trained in scuba, many contract the bends and are paralyed for life (or die). A chamber, it is argued, would help solve this problem. My question: wouldn't it be more effective to help these communities develop sustainable forms of lobster harvesting, thereby enabling resumption of freediving? Or, if scuba is still preferred, why not offer workshops and training on dive tables and safety? It seems to me that a chamber might offer a false sense of security, driving divers even deeper and longer. Also, I recall reading that another chamber that was donated by SOS in Hunduras(?) is not working because it has no engine? How does SOS plan on assuring that the one for Nicaragua will operate? I hope that I am not offending anyone, and please don't interpret my comments as criticism of your sincere desire to help. I'm just wondering if your approach is really going to work, or just cause more serious problems. Jack Edelstein, Ph.D.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]