At 09:21 AM 4/25/96 -0400, Dan Volker wrote: >[...] access and research at Wakulla SHOULD be based on skill, safety >levels and results demonstrated, [...] Followed by: >[...] What's the deal Mike? Tell me you don't want to dive with whining >homosexuals [...] Could someone explain to me why, if access to restricted dive sites should be based solely on skill, safety, and results, a diver's sexual orientation should even enter the debate? Was there a study I missed that found some correlation between sexual orientation and diving ability? If not, then why do slurs of this nature seem to appear so often on this list? They don't help the argument any, and they do annoy the rational, reasonable folks who might still be following the thread. Yell all you want about how it's just a joke, or whatever, but this sort of blatant bigotry is offensive and doesn't belong here. Stick some other category, like "women" or "<the-N-word>" or "<insert race/religion here>", in the sentence above and think about whether you'd post THAT to a public list... even in jest. BTW, gaining support (public, private, whatever) for a project or idea often has as much to do with how the project and its principals APPEAR to potential supporters than with the "bottom line" of what is actually being accomplished. In an ideal world it would be different, of course. In this world the folks who APPEAR rude, ignorant, and/or offensive are only making the road harder for themselves, regardless of their actual accomplishments. --tab -- Tracey [Baker] Wagner tab@pa*.co* *** New Jersey SCUBA Diving -- http://www.njscuba.com *** "Far beneath the sea, the past and the present come together as one, and we have been allowed to touch them both." -- Brad Sheard, _Beyond Sportdiving_
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]