Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 05 Mar 96 10:49:09 EST
From: John 015 <CC015012@BR*.br*.ed*>
Subject: Re: gas exchange rates , one more thing
To: techdiver@terra.net
>Posted on 4 Mar 1996 at 22:33:14 by Richard Pyle

>My main point, I guess, is that we can spec'alate 'till the cows come home

>about specific physiological mechanisms and how they relate to DCI
>probability, but if all those discussions are couched in the context of
>compartment-based models as the "true" explanation of what''s going on,
>then we may be deluding ourselves.


The domain of validity of a model can only be established
through observations.  I have a hard time seeing the risk
of delusion being confined to just the compartment-based
models.


I'm leaving for Florida shortly so I'll taper out my
contributions here with the following:

When I suggested that the M values scale with the mass I
suspected that what I did was nothing more than departing
from the compartment model and approach a statistical
free gas phase model with the DCI risk scaling with the total
number of bubbles in existance at any one given time.
I saw such a model as desirable because of the ease at which
it can be simulated on a computer.

I think the concensus was against me :-).

Later,
John

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]