Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
George, <gmiiii@in*.co*> wrote: (George attempted to take this discussion off line. I think at least this round belongs in the public domain where it all started.) > John, I guess the fact that we do this successfully means nothing >to you. The real world is a differnet place. I'm still waiting for >how to improve my scooters, lights and all. They are the best. The WKPP's safety record and success in itself means nothing. The statement that you have personell experienced in/working on all possible problems of both theoretical and practical nature related to aspects of diving (you didn't write this, it's my assumption based on your own writings below) is the important information in this whole thing. *If* the assumption is correct it shows that WKPP's safety record and overall success were by design and not by chance. Contrast this with "trust me" arguments and you'll see why I lump your assurances, Jack's arguments against electronics and similar arguments without a foundation in current day facts in with the campaign utterings of Pat Buchanen. So despite your assurances that the WKPP is "real diving", and that you possess equipment that qualify as "best", from here it looks like it's diving based on considerable insight and continued development based firmly on science. Maybe even first and foremost science and "real diving" second. >We have plenty of good engineers, and more good divers. We have >people whose job is risk analysis only. We actually do this stuff. >Kellon is right about the breathers - I use them, I know. Three >of the engineers off of the 16 and 19 are on our team. We know >just a little about this..... Bring them on line. Let's get the facts. John
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]