On Sun, 28 Jan 1996 HeyyDude@ao*.co* wrote: > Heyy Bernie, > > You now got a long way to swim, bucko... > > So, how is John's question a joke? His question was about those CO2 cartridges, not about a useful device that would get you to the surface in a hurry. When I first started diving, they were pretty-much standard equipment (for those who wore a BC... usually a horse-collar). There were a few problems for the average diver: 1/ The little ball tended to get caught and dump its load at unexpected times. 2/ The puncture system would corrode and freeze stuck. 3/ The system was a source of leaks (where it attached to the BC. But mainly........... 4/ There was insufficient gas to produce significant lift at depths below about 60ft. Now, I have since seen in another reply to the CO2 cart question that another diver has done some calculations that would give a couple of litres of gas at 140ft (I think that was it ?). I was suprised that there was that much lift, because a couple of litres would mean a couple of Kg. Acouple of Kg might just do it (Bucko). BUT.. If you're into an express-elevator emergency ride to the surface, then why carry a piece of gear (and an extra potential weak-point) that may or may not work? Do what the Poms do! Strap on a Fenzy! > > Considering all the other shit they sell for safety (I know, 'cause if you've > read any of my posts, you know I wear it all, including the "Farb/Irvine > Underwater Helicopter Rescue Device") - it seems to me that this isn't such a > stupid idea after all. The Farb/Irvine UHRD sounds like a classic. When will they reach Australia? > > Were any of us in that situation, we'd give our left 'nad for something, > ANYTHING to get us to the surface, bent or not. Probably true.... but better something that works. Regards, Bernie Woolfrey
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]