On Wed, 4 May 1994, Tom Stibolt wrote: > Not really. Hypoxia causes vasodilation and hyperoxia removes the > vasodilatory effect. Hyperoxia does not cause significant systemic > vasoconstriction (people don't lose legs and arms breathing 2.0 ATA O2 > in a chamber for instance) as you are assuming so there is no effect to be > "countered" by CO2. Are you sure about that? I have always read that O2 is a vasoconstrictor - not an inhibitor of vasodialation. People don't lose arms & legs in chambers because: 1) vasoconstriction does not equate to zero blood flow (as pointed out by Prime Rat); and 2) there is so much dissolved oxygen in the blood & tissues during hyperoxia that the tissues do not get hypoxic (if they did, the vasoconstriction effect would reduce, and the tissues would get the needed blood flow). Again: Yes? No? Maybe? I'm not trying to portray myself as a medical expert here - I am most certainly NOT such an expert. I just want to make sure I understand.... Aloha, Rich
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]