Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: Re: Oxygen Narcosis
From: harry@ra*.de*.co*.uk* (Harry Railing)
Date: Wed, 04 May 94 19:57:33 GMT
I believe that the paper refered to by Richard which was partially written by
Hamilton is as follows:-

-----------
In EUBS '90

DOES OXYGEN CONTRIBUTE TO THE NARCOTIC
ACTION OF HYPERBARIC AIR?

D. Linnarsson, A. Ostlund, A. Sporrong, F. Lind and R. W. Hamilton

Environmental Physiology Laboratory
Department of Physiology, Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, Sweden, and
Hamilton Research, Tarrytown, NY, USA


ABSTRACT

Although not a biochemically inert gas, oxygen has a lipid solubility
which is almost twice that of N2, and O2 may therefore exert an narcotic
action apart from its biochemical effects.  We determined the psychomotor
and mental performance impairments during exposures to air to normoxic
N2-O2 mixtures at 6, 8.5 and 11 bar ambient pressure in 10 subjects.  In
this pilot study 3, 3, and 4 subjects were studied at 6, 8.5, and 11 bar
respectively, and N2-O2 and air exposures were not randomized.  Overall
mental and psychomotor performance was im-paired by up to 40% at the
highest ambient pressure as compared to control at 1.3 bar breathing air.
Despite a substantially lower N2 partial pressure in the hyperbaric air
experiments, performance was impaired to the same degree as in the
corresponding N2-O2 experiments.  It thus seems that substituting O2 fro
some of the N2 does not ameliorate the mild narcosis.  Within the
limitations of the experimental design our results suggest that O2
contributes to the narcosis of hyperbaric air.

INTRODUCTION


Exposure to hyperbaric air causes narcosis which limits the usefulness of
air as a diving gas.  This well known phenomenon can be observed already
at depth of 30 m and becomes more serious with increasing depth (2,5).
Adolfson (1) reported that some subjects became totally incapacitated at
an air pressure corresponding to 120-130 m sea water (13-14 bar absolute
pressure) and that 11 bar air caused considerable decrements in
psychomotor performance. Usually this narcosis has been considered as an
effect of the N2 component of hyperbaric air.  In this pilot study we have
addressed the question whether O2 present in the hyperbaric air
contributes to the narcosis together with N2.

This may be so, since the narcotic potency of gases is related to their
lipid solubility (4) and since the lipid solubility of O2 is almost twice
that of N2.

METHODS

Ten healthy subjects were studied.  All experiments were performed in a
hyperbaric chamber.  Respired gases were supplied with a low-resistance
demand regulator (InterSpiro, Sweden).  Psychomotor and mental performance
was assessed with a computerized test battery (6).  Each subject performed
repeated training sessions at 1 bar air before the hyperbaric experiments
in order to minimize learning effects of repeated tests.  The test battery
consisted of three 2-minute tests of reaction time, perceptive ability and
cognitive ability.  Each hyperbaric session started and ended with
base-line control measurements with air at 1.3 bar.  After a first
control, subjects were compressed to 6 bar (n=3), 8.5 bar (n=3) or 11 bar
(n=4).  At these ambient pressures each subject performed the test battery
twice, first breathing a normoxic N2-O2 and then breathing air.  Each test
was preceded by a 5-10 min resting period to permit wash-in/wash-out of
gases.

The order of the test was randomized among the subjects but was constant
for each subject.  Results were computed as the total number of correct
responses per two-minute test in per cent of the arithmetic mean of the
two control runs. An overall performance index was computed as an average
per cent number of correct responses for all three test types.


RESULTS


There was a gradually increasing degree of performance impairment as the
ambient pressure was increased (Fig. 1).  In 6 subjects the impairment of
overall performance at a given ambient pressure was less marked with air
than with normoxic N2-O2. and in 4 subjects the reverse was true.  No
significant intra-individual differences (Student's t-test) were observed
when applying Student's t-test.

DISCUSSION


Study design and statistics

The design of this pilot study was dictated by that of a parallel study
with a differing scientific objective, whey the present design has not
been optimized to address the issue whether oxygen contributes to the
narcotic action of hyperbaric air or not.  Thus the air and normoxic N2-O2
experiments were not randomized and all 10 subjects were not observed at
the same ambient pressure.  With these limitations in mind, a cautious
interpretation of data is warranted.

Contribution of oxygen to the narcotic action of hyperbaric air

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]