Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
--------------03F7AB1034918DC6BD35F56F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Scott, So I guess you are saying that socialism is not a theory based on the belief that all, while contributing to the good of a community, are equal, none better than the other, equally entitled to the same quality of care and protection that the community can provide? Let me know so I can inform the right people and get them busy redefining history! Socialism is not a singular "economic ideal" as you put it, but, a theory which takes on different forms based on the stresses applied to it (i.e. Marxian Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Christian Socialism, etc. etc.). Anyway one looks upon it, all forms of the theory agree in being opposed to uncontrolled capitalism (unregulated private ownership of businesses for the sake of profit) and seek equality of opportunity for all members of the community. I reiterate, the military is set up on the theory of socialism. Now you think back to Poly Sci. 101 wherever you took it from; Socialism is a theory, dictatorships are a form of government, totalitarianism is a form of government, the military in the U.S. is not a form of government, last I looked. Get your facts straight and come clean with us. Your problem is not with the theory of socialism or how it is run. You said so yourself and I quote " ...the leadership of the military really has nothing whatever to do with socialism". So from now on if you want to call somebody a dictator or tyrant just do it by name and don't try to take a cheap shot over my shoulder, don't question my education, don't play semantics, or fuck with me. I knew better than to post that, hell I don't even discuss politics with my mother-in-law much less.... Brett ScottBonis@ao*.co* wrote: > In a message dated 7/14/00 6:40:46 PM, stelarlb@sw*.ne* writes: > > << Lest we forget the military in all nations both communist and democratic. > If > you want a perfect example of socialism you need only look toward our > own military. If you must ask, the reasoning behind this is that all > members are "on the same page" thus work together as a team when kicking a > third world ass. > Brett >> > > Hi Brett, > > I don't know where you received your education in political science, but I'm > afraid that the military is definitely not an example of socialism. A > dictatorship, yes. Totalitarianism, yes. But socialism, no way. > > Socialism is an economic ideal that has been practiced (usually not too > successfully) in the Eijido's in Mexico and the Kibbutz's in Israel, for > example. But the leadership of the military really has nothing whatever to > do with socialism. > > Take care and safe diving, Scott --------------03F7AB1034918DC6BD35F56F Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en"> <html> Hi Scott, <br>So I guess you are saying that socialism is not a theory based on the belief that all, while contributing to the good of a community, are equal, none better than the other, equally entitled to the same quality of care and protection that the community can provide? Let me know so I can inform the right people and get them busy redefining history! Socialism is not a singular "economic ideal" as you put it, but, a theory which takes on different forms based on the stresses applied to it (i.e. Marxian Socialism, Democratic Socialism, Christian Socialism, etc. etc.). Anyway one looks upon it, all forms of the theory agree in being opposed to uncontrolled capitalism (unregulated private ownership of businesses for the sake of profit) and seek equality of opportunity for all members of the community. I reiterate, the military is set up on the theory of socialism. Now you think back to Poly Sci. 101 wherever you took it from; Socialism is a theory, dictatorships are a form of government, totalitarianism is a form of government, the military in the U.S. is not a form of government, last I looked. Get your facts straight and come clean with us. Your problem is not with the theory of socialism or how it is run. You said so yourself and I quote " ...the leadership of the military really has nothing whatever to do with socialism". So from now on if you want to call somebody a dictator or tyrant just do it by name and don't try to take a cheap shot over my shoulder, don't question my education, don't play semantics, or fuck with me. I knew better than to post that, hell I don't even discuss politics with my mother-in-law much less.... <br>Brett <p>ScottBonis@ao*.co* wrote: <blockquote TYPE=CITE>In a message dated 7/14/00 6:40:46 PM, stelarlb@sw*.ne* writes: <p><< Lest we forget the military in all nations both communist and democratic. <br>If <br>you want a perfect example of socialism you need only look toward our <br>own military. If you must ask, the reasoning behind this is that all <br>members are "on the same page" thus work together as a team when kicking a <br>third world ass. <br>Brett >> <p>Hi Brett, <p>I don't know where you received your education in political science, but I'm <br>afraid that the military is definitely not an example of socialism. A <br>dictatorship, yes. Totalitarianism, yes. But socialism, no way. <p>Socialism is an <b>economic ideal</b> that has been practiced (usually not too <br>successfully) in the Eijido's in Mexico and the Kibbutz's in Israel, for <br>example. But <b>the leadership of the military really has nothing whatever to</b> <br><b>do with socialism.</b> <p>Take care and safe diving, Scott</blockquote> </html> --------------03F7AB1034918DC6BD35F56F--
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]