CLEARLY i was saying the light works well in high, low, and very low vis.

As for diving in mud puddles, no thanks.

At 03:43 PM 5/8/2000 -0500, Joel Markwell wrote:
>on 5/8/00 2:17 PM, Kevin Connell at kevin@nw*.co* wrote:
>
> > I've seen the HID in both high vis, low vis and almost no-vis.
> >
> > It is a much tighter, more effective beam in all cases.
>
>An interesting reply. Clearly you weren't responding to me since I didn't
>mention low-vis except to indicate that it might be effective there. What I
>did indicate was that I have never seen a light that can penetrate a total
>siltout of the kind described.
>
>Are you also saying that this light can penetrate, to a useful degree, total
>silt-out conditions such as one might find in a low-flow cave zapped with
>deep silt/clay and/or narrow crawl-throughs, same conditions, low-flow, deep
>silt/clay?
>
>Tighter, more effective, sure, I agree, incredibly so. If you can afford it,
>dive with it. Rely on it for what it is and what it can do.
>
>Please clarify.
>
>Later,
>
>JoeL


----------------------------------
  Kevin Connell <kevin@nw*.co*>

  NW Labor Systems, Inc
  http://www.nwls.com



----------------------------------

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]