Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01BFA5E7.40673FC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tom, I feel the members that pay dues to your organization and support = IANTD have a right to know what the "old pot and kettle in return" = policy that you and your board of advisors are employing really is. = After all, "you" do advertise your agency for it's "renowned attitude, = standards,.....ethics" and so-forth in international diving magazines, = so please explain to us all the following statement that you made. Most = especially "the old pot and kettle return". Tom Mount wrote: <If you still are not satisfied I will give you the entire BOA contacts = and you can get everyones opnion but I think it will be about the same. Especially as some of your actions most likely would be considered as = well . You know the old kittle and pot return> "the old kettle and pot return" policy Tom??? Is this what is considered = a fair and impartial review within your agency??? Tom, you just proved to everyone = how IANTD truly conducts themselves (does kangaroo court ring a bell). It is = a shame that "YOU" and your agency pass judgement in such a fashion. So = what if I called Stone's goat roping at Wakulla 2 a accident waiting to happen, = and then he proved me right with a dead Nobel Peace Prize Winner. I wish it never happened, = and I feel sorry for the family, but you can't say I didn't try to stop it, how about you? What did you do = other than cheer them on? This also has no bearing on the ethics complaint that I have just filed with you, and you = know it. It's to bad that "you" and your organization conduct themselves based on other = peoples beliefs and affiliations, rather than by merit alone like real men do. = Your not pulling the wool over nobody's eyes on this one when you say I got a fair review = (look at your last statements). To top it off, you storm off in a little girly = fit when you have been truly exposed for what you are, and then want to end all communication. No Tom, it is time for the rest of the world to see "you" = and your little traveling muppet show for what it truly is, a good ole boy circle jerk. Bruic ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01BFA5E7.40673FC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>Tom, I feel the members that pay dues to your organization and = support=20 IANTD have a right to know what the "old pot and kettle in return" = policy that=20 you and your board of advisors are employing really is. After all, = "you" do=20 advertise your agency for it's "renowned attitude, = standards,.....ethics"=20 and so-forth in international diving magazines, so please explain to us = all the=20 following statement that you made. Most especially "the old = pot and=20 kettle return".</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Tom Mount wrote:<BR><BR><If you still are not satisfied I = will give=20 you the entire BOA contacts and<BR>you can get everyones opnion but I = think it=20 will be about the same.<BR>Especially as some of your actions most = likely would=20 be considered as well .<BR>You know the old kittle and pot = return></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>"the old kettle and pot return" policy Tom??? Is this what is = considered a=20 fair and<BR>impartial review within your agency??? Tom, you just proved = to=20 everyone how<BR>IANTD truly conducts themselves (does kangaroo court = ring a=20 bell). It is a<BR>shame that "YOU" and your agency pass = judgement in=20 such a fashion. So what if I<BR>called Stone's goat roping at Wakulla 2 = a=20 accident waiting to happen, and then he proved<BR>me right with a dead = Nobel=20 Peace Prize Winner. I wish it never happened, and I feel sorry for the = family,=20 but<BR>you can't say I didn't try to stop it, how about you? What did = you do=20 other than cheer them on? This also has no<BR>bearing on the ethics = complaint that I have just filed with you, and you know it. It's to = bad<BR>that=20 "you" and your organization conduct themselves based on other = peoples<BR>beliefs=20 and affiliations, rather than by merit alone like real men do. Your not = pulling=20 the<BR>wool over nobody's eyes on this one when you say I got a fair = review=20 (look<BR>at your last statements). To top it off, you storm off in a = little=20 girly fit when<BR>you have been truly exposed for what you are, and then = want to=20 end all<BR>communication. No Tom, it is time for the rest of the world = to see=20 "you" and<BR>your little traveling muppet show for what it truly is, a = good ole=20 boy<BR>circle jerk.<BR><BR>Bruic<BR><BR><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01BFA5E7.40673FC0--
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]