Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: cavers

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Caruso, Christina R (Christina)" <ccaruso@lu*.co*>
To: "'John Grogan'" <john@ro*.co*.uk*>,
     "'Kevin Connell'"
    
Cc: cavers@cavers.com
Subject: RE: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:28:08 -0400
John,
	Like I said, I read the article a year ago, and have owned the wings
almost a year.  NOW I know better, NOW I dive DIR, NOW I want to get rid of
my Scubapro wings.  I don't care if the buyer just uses them for experiments
to prove that they SUCK.  I just don't want to throw away wings that I spent
$500 on!  Someone may have a use for them.  Just advertising that they are
for sale (and pointed out that some from of redundancy/safety is good for
DEEP ocean diving).

-----Original Message-----
From: John Grogan [mailto:john@ro*.co*.uk*]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 1999 11:44 AM
To: Caruso, Christina R (Christina); 'Kevin Connell'
Cc: cavers@cavers.com
Subject: Re: Scubapro Super Tek dual bladder wings for sale


Christina,
Don't believe everything you read in those mags.  A healthy amount of common
sense is often all you need to cut through the crap.  Just think these
things through.

John.

>Most tech groups currently recommend Hogarthian set ups or minimization,
but
>I have seen numerous editorials defending redundancy for deep ocean diving
>and last year there was an article (in Deep Tech I think..) that suggested
>dual BCs as an option for this.  I don't think that's as practical as dual
>bladders (cleaner set up).  If you want I can try to hunt through my old
>copies and try to find the article and therefore the author...

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]