Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: cavers

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: Lawrence Orchard-London <lorchard@Ru*.co*>
To: "Stockmann, Sten" <sten.stockmann@ca*.fi*>,
     "'Ted'"
    
Cc: cavers@cavers.com
Subject: RE: RE:
Date: Mon, 3 May 1999 01:47:56 -0400
I also use the "M" at the end since this saves confusion over the "6" being
mistaken for a "9", though of course it says "Oxygen" as well anyway.

Best
Loz

-----Original Message-----
From: Stockmann, Sten [mailto:sten.stockmann@ca*.fi*]
Sent: 01 May 1999 08:25
To: 'Ted'
Cc: cavers@cavers.com
Subject: RE: 


Ted,

we just use the letter "M" to indicate meters, like "OXYGEN 6M" or "21 M".
Plain, simple & easy.

rgds,

//Sten

-- The He exposure calculation was based on inert-gas counterdiffusion
differentials calculated using Boolean algorithms developed using Fibonacci
numbers --

> ----------
> From: 	Ted[SMTP:tedchias@is*.da*.ca*]
> Sent: 	 30. 04 1999 17:13
> To: 	kirvine@sa*.ne*
> Cc: 	Stephen E Jolley; cavers@cavers.com
> Subject: 	Re: 
> 
> hey guys
> I know I am going to get flamed to hell on this somehow, but I really am
> just wondering
> the DIR approach to marking does seem more clear and more easily
> understood, and therefore on the face of it a better method, but when
> marking depth, won't it be confusing to mark in feet for all the euros?
> is there a metric/imperial DIR standard?
> I looked through the archives, but didn't find this question previously
> addressed.
> thanks in advance
> ted
> 
> 
> 
> 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]