Subject: 
        Another chamber ride?
  Date: 
        Mon, 22 Feb 1999 15:36:54 -0500 (EST)
  From: 
        Charles Actor <cactor@pa*.mo*.co*>
    To: 
        kirvine@sa*.ne*


I'll preface this by saying that it is second hand info...

A friend just got back from Ginnie.  He mentioned that he was
talking to Brian Kakuk.  Brian said that he was late for the
slide show Sat. night because they just took someone else to
the chamber.

Not good....

Chuck

Richard Pyle wrote:
> 
> Bill,
> 
> I'm still waiting for a reply to the lying bullshit message I sent to you a
few  days ago trying to cover Stone and Norstrom's asses.  You appear to be
ignoring me, or maybe you didn't get my private
> message, or both.
> 
> In any case, avoiding as much politics as I can, I humbly request that you
> provide your own answers to the following questions.
> 
> With reference to the Tallahassee Democrat article at
> http://www.tdo.com/news/breaking/docs/19SCIENTI-CMP-NWS.htm:
> 
> 1. When Wakulla County Sheriff David Harvey said, "We're pretty certain . .
> . that had he been at Wal-Mart, he would have also died"; what do you
> suppose he meant:
> 
>   a. The air conditioners used at Wal-Mart cause a hypoxic environment to
> exist in those stores?
>   b. Wal-Mart is giving away free rebreathers?
>   c. The causes of Henry Kendall's death were most likely unrelated to his
> breathing mixture and his diving equipment?
> 
> 2. When the article goes on to say, "It may be several days before Harvey
> gets a final coroner's report, but he said an autopsy showed Kendall died of
> natural causes -- likely from hemorrhaging that started in the stomach.";
> which of the following is most likely correct, in your opinion:
> 
>   a. The Tallahassee Democrat article mis-quoted Sheriff Harvey?
>   b. Sheriff Harvey misunderstood the Coroner's report of the autopsy
> results?
>   c. Sheriff Harvey is lying?
>   d. The Coroner was mistaken in his conclusion?
>   e. The Coroner is lying?
>   f. Hemorrhaging starting in the stomach is a consequence of hypoxia?
>   g. From the information we have so far, the correct answer to question
> number 1 above seems to be "c"?
> 
> 3. When you drop hints, inuendos, and blatant accusations that the people
> associated with the Wakulla 2 project are somehow trying to cover-up or
> misrepresent the true cause of Herny Kendall's death, are you suggesting
> that:
> 
>   a. The Wakulla 2 team has so much political power that they can influence
> what Sheriff Harvey reports to the media?
>   b. The Wakulla 2 team has so much political power that they can persuade
> the Coroner to issue a false report?
>   c. There really is no Sheriff Harvey, but rather one of the Wakulla 2 team
> members is masquerading as him?
>   d. There really is no Coroner, but rather one of the Wakulla 2 team
> members is masquerading as such?
>   e. Jeffrey McMurray, author of the Tallahassee Democrat article, is really
> a member of the Wakulla 2 team?
>   f. No member of the Wakulla 2 team has ever tried to misrepresent Henry
> Kendall's cause of death, but you just want everyone to believe that they
> did.
> 
> I'm eagerly awaiting your response to these questions.  I imagine you will
> avoid directly answering these questions by trying to change the subject,
> with references to Richard Nordstrom's comments in that same Tallahassee
> Democrat article, and/or by referencing the death of Ian Rolland.  Don't
> bother with that tactic.  I've already confirmed with Richard Nordstrom that
> in his conversation with the reporter, the topic was CLEARLY specific to the
> MK-5P (quite different from the prototype MK-4). Also, as you know (or at
> least should know) from the information relevant to Ian's death that I sent
> you in private: whereas I am waiting to see the Coroner's report before
> forming my own opinion on the true cause of Henry's death, there is NO DOUBT
> that Ian's death was NOT a result of hypoxia (whether or not it had anything
> to do with diabetes). We can discuss these issues in greater detail on
> another thread if you wish, but I would appreciate it if you would first
> respond by answering the three questions above.
> 
> If you choose to not to answer my questions, then I suggest you follow the
> advice I offered in my private mail and resist the urge to convert hearsay,
> inuendo, and speculation into "facts", as you seem to be doing at the
> moment.
> 
> Aloha,
> Rich
> 
> P.S. No, this is not a joke, nor do I think any of this is funny.
> 
> Richard L. Pyle
> Ichthyology, Bishop Museum
> 1525 Bernice St., Honolulu, HI 96817
> Ph: (808) 848-4115  Fax: (808) 847-8252
> email: deepreef@bi*.or*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]