> The issue of "air" in a nitrox tank - ie fO2 less than say, 22%, has more to do > with that formality of staying on the literal side of the labeling issue. "Air" > is a nitrox, but it is not EAN. I think people read too much meaning into a Nitrox sticker. I haven't re-checked how the various agencies define what their nitrox stickers mean, but I really don't care. A nitrox sticker is a very public way of announcing that the tank _may_ not contain simple 21% air and that the user needs to be aware of its contents before breathing off of it. Period nothing more. > the line. What about 20%?, 19, 15?, etc..... What about them? The markings on the tank just told you not to use the tank without knowing what is inside. So the issue is whether a marked tank can contain a simpler mix. As a related argument, can a trimix marked tank only contain nitrox? (but I would argue a nitrox tank shouldn't contain trimix) > Maybe in the future, clean air in nitrox labeled tanks will be more > acceptable. That future is here in my mind and unless I go to Kansas I'm not turning my watch back. But if I am away from home and go into a shop with my nitrox tanks but only 21% mix in them, I do respect the right of a shop to want to inspect them. Mike
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]