> Gentlemen... > Thank you so much for your useless information (except for R. > Williams and Kevin Neil K.)Is a female's body too inferior for the > designers of dry suits? Or are you finally accepting that once again the > macho male dominance in diving has one more time underestimated ME!!!! > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@terra.net'. > Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@terra.net'. Hmmm. Given that backpackers have only just got around (in the last five years) to designing a disposable, shaped, funnel to enable female hikers to piss off trail without dekitting and micturating cul nu, it's not that surprising that female techdivers (as you point out the MMD) haven't got a solution yet. My understanding is that astronauts (the only folks we can really look to in this) use a disposable nappy system with an automatic air lock for waste removal; but it's never been used in hot blood because no-one wants to risk depressurising the suit. A bit complicated for us. Apply your mighty brain power. If Rich can re-invent tech diving from scratch, surely you can come up with a feminine p-valve. And let's face it. No matter how liberated the man, you're still going to know far more about the female anatomy than we are. You could still use an internal catheter; mount it in your knickers rather than on a condom. That points you on a par with the lads. If of course you wish to exceed them, you'll need something designed yourself. Please don't get shirty. And don't forget that to be acceptable it must be hogarthian and George must want to use it. :-) Jason
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]