Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
You wrote: >From: gmiiii@in*.co* >To: "Cave Divers List" <cavers@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*> >Subject: Re: Change of subject - Deep Air, Mr. Odom >Date: Wed, 18 Oct 1995 13:06:08 -0700 >Errors-to: <ken@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*> >Reply-to: cavers@co*.ci*.uf*.ed* >Sender: Maiser@co*.ci*.uf*.ed* >X-listname: <cavers@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.00.06.17 (via Mercury MTS v1.21) >Message-ID: <14AA8140F66@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*> > > Luck, Chris, it' scalled luck - Carl's just ran out >that day. Knowing both of the "specimens" you mentioned >greatly reinforces this thinking. - George > > > >---- End Forwarded Message > >Not knowing the people involved, it is hard to assess the factors that contributed. >But luck appears to be weak reason > >One has to start with the 'reason for the accident': >Data needed for this - Was body recovered > Did anybody witness circumstances > Autopsy - was there one > If yes, findings > Is base line data on victim available - overall health, > problems, medications, etc. > What was the status at time or at approximate time of > accident > work load > Recent exercise, sleep, etc. history. > Circumstances of dive & interplay with physiol of diver > > If all of these variables, plus a plethora of others could be compiled, then >the reason why the problem then & there may be arrived at. > > To some degree it is like the analysis the NTSB does following an aircraft >accident. They have the saving grace of the black box, flight recorder, aircraft >maintenance logs, pilot logs, etc. > > >
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]