Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: ucca15j <ucca15j@uc*.ac*.uk*>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 17:42:32 +0100
To: techdiver@terra.net
Subject: UK-dive show

Dear All,

I've just been to the U.K. dive show where a number of rebreathers were on
show.  I thought I would post 'my' reasonably educated, hopeful end user
view of what I saw.

Cis-Lunar......
	On its own stand, helpful sales/technical people.  The unit looked
as though it had been flown post-haste from Mexico, this being on of its
main advantages in terms of sales, i.e. famous cave explorers using/designing
them.  As an exploration model it looked as it should, lots of back up
gauges, all the fittings were either OEM (made by an equip. manufacturer)
or solidly machined (possibly over engineered).

The main advantage I could see over its rival (Oceanic) was the chest mounted
counter lungs, which as well as positon seemed sturdy.  Apparently the
mk.5 will have better routed breathing hoses, better layout, smartened up
box etc.
(All the internal workings have been well covered in a number of books/articles
so don't ask me)

Oceanic........
	My first (customer) thought on seeing it was 2 million spent and your
using 4-D cell torches with a wire silicon set into it as battery packs!!!!
It seems nickelrocketry lives everywhere.  Bearing in mind these shows are
designed to sell.  The unit seems to be designed for ease of use over
functionalty (contradiction), what I mean is that the counter lung is in
the fibre glass back pack not on chest.  This was confirmed by the sales
man, everything else (scrubber etc.) seems well designed. Apparently the
main benefit over cis-lunar is that the cis-lunar requires the operator
to calibrate the O2 sensors, while the Oceanic doesn't.  Also the Oceanic
comes with one computer display (to be easier to use) no LEDs telling you
the sensors work etc.

Drager.....(semi)
	Nice looking model aimed at sport market, the main two problems
I thought were the flimsy counter lungs, and the over-pressure valve which
sits at the top of the back-pack and is supposed to be user adjustable based
on breathing rate?? Firstly it would be difficult to adjust in water 
(apparantly adjustment is made pre and post dive based on experience/ size
of user ) the second is that placed ther it would be easy to inadvertently
break it.  Everything else seemed well designed, different nitrox mixes
require different flows or replenishing gas and there is  a flow controller
with fixed orifice sizes for various mixes.

Prism.....(semi)
	Saw one hidden in a corner, seems to have died done in publicity
lately.  However it looks to have the best designed scrubber of the lot.
And I would bet that Cochran are planning to upgrade it to fully closed.
Perhaps a market exists for a semi-closed with an on-board real time
deco calculator. (Benefits - computer doesn't need to control any gas flows,
presumably easier more reliable as far as computer is concerned.)

p.s. back to Draeger....
The other dodgy bit was the hose connections to breathing bag, some of which
were quick! connect type while others were compression, all of which were
fiddly and looked inadequate (saw a demonstration of how easy it is to
remove and clean bag).

p.s.2 All except the cis-lunar, had mouth piece shot offs (stops water entering
the loop) that were badly designed.  The un-dived version worked when you held
both sides, while the dived versions (salt deposits) would have resulted in
ripping the mouth pieces out.  Not ideal really.  has no ome thought to use
some arrangement of mushroom type valves??  The cis-lunar version did work,
and an engineer friend there also noted that it could be done better.

So there you have it my opinion.

yours jon.

-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-   
   Jon Dann
   Christopher Ingold Laboratories
   Chemistry Department
   University College London           e-mail: J.Dann@uc*.ac*.uk*
   20 Gordon Street, WC1 HOAJ             tel: 0171 387 7050 ext. 4651  
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+- 

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]